so someone else can do the dirty work. so are you suggesting pearson should play instead? imo he's woeful much worse than kilkenny
One thing Pearson ain't is worse than Kilkenny, sometimes he goes quiet but he can make something out of nothing and he pops up with the old goal, he works his socks off the whole 90 and with skuse he's played well
So James Wilson is the fall guy at the back whereas it's Fonts who has made the biggest gaffs with miskicks turning into goals against. Glad to see Cole Skuse back and that Davies is nominally paired with Baldock although listening to DMc Davies could be making the midfield five instead of four. COYR
"Kilkenny wil moan at everyone and blame them for his inadequacies and really badly slow the play down? (this is the worse thing of all because it lets the opposition regroup when we could break quickly. he will eradicate whats been the best thing about our strike force lately)" Paraphrased from my quote earlier .. exactly what happened!! I would take Pearson over Kilkenny all day long, every day. (and I ain't overawed)
I have said it many times Davies needs to play in a midfield role. And tonight he played just behind Baldock. Pearson needs to be dropped not permently because he can be usefull but the one thing I have noticed about Pearson is when the subs are all used he really drops off. Some of his turning his back on play at times is painfull. The other he just ball watches don't put a tackle in. That ball should of never came in for their goal without at least a challenge. Kilkenny is as much use as Kenny from South Park and we all know what happens with him. Why people insist on calling him Killa is beyond me.
CCR by the time you have read this you would notice I'm in your plant tomorrow. But calling him Killa is like calling Kylie and fat old bint, the two just don't go together
