It's been mentioned on other threads, but not in a thread of its own; does anybody know why we don't play him? Is it his fitness? He can't be injured or he wouldn't make the bench. Come on Cotts - give him a run-out or send him back so we save some money (or at least tell us why you don't play him)
That would mean communicating with the plebs bcfcred and City aren't on that wavelength. There has to be a reason of course but will anyone be prepared to say why?
Crazy when he came on at home a couple of games ago looked tidy. Will be on good money,bet he did not come to sit on the bench. Very strange indeed.
On Saturday he took off the wing backs who were knackered the other substitution was Wilbs for Agard - arguably he could have brought on Cox, but Wilbs gave us an out ball
Second guessing SC is difficult. I'll never understand why we haven't a better keeper, however I'm content to leave it all to SC. For whatever reason our pre-season signings didn't work out how we hoped. Defending is our weak point, but I've never seen better football going forward than I have this season. Can't wait for Hull.
Hull are on fire they have the ability to readily get around us and put the game to bed by the 30th minute! we will need to contain them for the first 15 to 20 mins .. .. this is one game that I will be very very happy to get a point from....
home form needs to improve,if we are to climb the table,three points excellent,a draw okay,a loss bad.
We always perform well for Sky - I wonder if thats the game Cotts is saving him for - to unleash him against the Tigers!!!
