1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Sevco to sue Rangers

Discussion in 'Celtic' started by RebelBhoy, Jul 17, 2012.

  1. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Looks like war could break out between the administrators at Rangers and the people they sold the assets off to.

    Sevco threatens administrator with legal action
    By Chris McLaughlin Senior Football Reporter, BBC Scotland

    The consortium in charge of the new Rangers is threatening legal action against the administrator who sold them the old club's assets.

    Sevco Ltd claims that Duff and Phelps renaged on a deal to pay back around £500,000 put up by the consortium to help fund working capital when it agreed to buy the club back in June.

    But Duff and Phelps has denied that the money should already be paid back.

    They say they have a legally binding agreement which they have adhered to.

    The Sevco consortium led by former Sheffield United chief executive Charles Green bought Rangers assets for £5.5m after failing to prevent the club heading for liquidation.

    Sevco were denied a place in the Scottish Premier League and the fresh dispute comes in the middle of negotiations with the Scottish Football Association for a membership that would allow the new club to start life in Division Three.

    A consortium source told BBC Scotland that an agreement was in place whereby it provided the £500,000 to the administrator with the promise of most of it being returned by mid-June.

    But the consortium has yet to see any of the cash and says it is still awaiting an explanation from Duff and Phelps despite numerous calls and emails.

    "Shortly before the takeover, Duff and Phelps asked us to make an additional payment of £500,000 to pay for operating costs from 1 June to 14 June," said the consortium source.

    "This was on top of the original £250,000 and £5.5m.

    "D&P said they expected to spend only around half of the money, that they'd give a breakdown of all that was spent and that the remainder would be returned a couple of days after the 14 June.

    "All we have is an indication that most of the money has been spent, with no breakdown."

    Duff and Phelps, who remain in charge of the old Rangers until it goes into liquidation, refuted the allegations.

    "It was made clear to the consortium that the balance of running costs from the end of May to June the 14th would be repaid at the earliest opportunity," the adminstrator stated.

    "These costs and liabilities are being finalised before the balance is being returned.

    "This is happening within a perfectly normal time frame and there is absolutely nothing untoward here.

    "There will be full transparancy on all the costs."
     
    #1
  2. Mind The Duck

    Mind The Duck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    38,498
    Likes Received:
    14,975
    What a mess

    So funny

    I'll miss these good times when they're buried
     
    #2
  3. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    there's more

    please log in to view this image
     
    #3
  4. rogueleader

    rogueleader suave gringo

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    19,250
    Likes Received:
    8,235
    <laugh> I really doubt the sfa /spl would have the balls to do it, even if it is the right thing...but, one can live in hope.
     
    #4
  5. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    They have to strip those tainted trophies, the Integrity of the game is what is important, Rangers and their famous "Dignity" have no choice but to offer to accept they are wrong..if it's proven they were cheating.
     
    #5
  6. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I fear that their use of the word "dignity" is as hollow as their use of the word "loyal" and their snappy catchphrases about not "walking away"

    Nice buzzword amongst their support but ultimately cheap and worthless.
     
    #6

Share This Page