Ok Regardless of the fact we actually paid money for hulse..... Who was the Worse signing... Hulse or Clarke?
Hulse, by a long way. His transfer fee was infinitely more (literally) and he's had more of a chance than Clarke had.
Although Hulse was alot more and has had a bigger chance, whenever i've seen Clarke he's been abysmal. Against Cardiff, I thought Hulse's hold up play was actually very good
Clarke is far worse I think hulse has the ability to score where as Clarke couldn't score in a brothel.
I fancied us to get a result at Naawich Then I found out before the kick off that he had selected Clarke I should of been given an instant refund
