Oh jolly good, the god threads roll into a 2nd week. At this rate we`ll still be mass debating the Lords existance as we celebrate his Sons birth in a few months time.
Its that age old debate. No one knows and more importantly does anyone give a ****? As far as I'm concerned you can believe in what you like until you tell me I'm wrong to believe what I like. Then I will unleash hell!
Nope...Stage B contained your Stage A so there's no going back from this point of Stage B. When Stage B came into existence, so did Stage A.
If you don't give a **** why don't you do us all a favour and **** off? And it's unleash, not unlease.
Nope...thats where your argument falls over. What is time? Is it matter? That is, is it made from atoms, molecules, does it have mass?
How does my answer defeat the purpose of the OP? I don't accept any of the current theories. That's an answer. I don't have to offer one of my own. What have I mocked by rejecting every current answer as unproven? No, it doesn't. What's the point of origin/creator of the universe or matter? If you claim god is, then what's the point of origin/creator of god? The big bang doesn't suggest that there's a creating force at all. It says that the universe was once in a super dense and hot state, before it expanded. As far as we know, nothing has ever been created. You weren't talking from my perspective. You said that you couldn't accept not having an answer, so you've taken god to be that answer. Reproduction and creation are not the same thing. We have evidence for one of them. Our existence is not evidence of a creator. This is absolute drivel. If you accept that is true, then who created god, as his existence is clearly evidence of a creator and who created the creature that created god? That goes on forever and doesn't make any sense in the first place. And this grass eating, third eye-lidded man looked like what, exactly? The development of man from...? Yes, it is. Look it up. None of the parts of the eye are useless outside of the sum. Please feel free to say what they are, if you believe otherwise. How do you explain the eye's blind spot, by the way? Did god miss a bit? Read the whole article, rather than skimming it and totally missing the point, then you might know. Not with your answer, it isn't. Then we have to go back to how god came into existence which, according to your train of thought, would require a creator, who would also require a creator and so on.
