1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

New Moderator

Discussion in 'Sunderland' started by Steven Royston O'Neill, Feb 3, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 3 of 3
  1. Nads

    Nads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    38,228
    Likes Received:
    40,069
    I'd be happy to do it, as a share with someone else, it would have to be a share as, quite frankly, i wouldn't mod anything, as i don't get offended.

    I'd suggest someone like mackems rule, and would be happy to help out, ie if he wanted a second opinion on something, or if there was some conflict, i'd gladly wade in and help out.

    So yeah, i'd do it, and can i go on record and say i appreciate being put forward, nice to know people appreciate and enjoy your views <ok>
     
    #41
    Nads, Feb 4, 2011
  2. CyprusMackem

    CyprusMackem Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,010
    Likes Received:
    18
    Funny how everyone hated the mod's on 606. Now everyone wants to be one.
    Personally I think we shouldn't pick from one of our own. A good mod should be unbiased in any discussion to be effective.
    The NewcARSEtle mod is a good example of a bad biased mod. <monster>
     
    #42
    CyprusMackem, Feb 4, 2011
  3. Dyno

    Dyno Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    0
    #43
    Dyno, Feb 4, 2011
  4. Poolie Blackcat

    Poolie Blackcat New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm on the Mackemsrule bandwagon. If he needs a campaign manager I'd be happy to put myself forward, as long as the pay is sufficient...
     
    #44
    Poolie Blackcat, Feb 4, 2011
  5. safc73

    safc73 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,027
    Likes Received:
    0
    BB I'd be more than happy with you and MR
     
    #45
    safc73, Feb 4, 2011
  6. MackemsRule

    MackemsRule Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,621
    Likes Received:
    118
    Right guys read through all the comments and have to say I'm one very proud Mackem, not for the nomination but for the reasoned debate on a mod.

    I thank all for putting me forward.

    Even though it may say I'm logged in, it doesn't mean I am actually here, as I just leave the forum open in the background.

    I honestly think we can self moderate, but as Syd has done a Bent Carol on us, we will need someone with the Mod power for emergencies.

    I agree with BruceysBeak maybe a couple of us with the "power" and if there's a dispute it can be discussed and decided on. ( On that basis I would agree to mod! )

    The only reason I could see for banning someone is either blatant racism or posting CP.

    Warnings for personal attacks and over the top abuse.

    Big-Chris would stay as he is like the board whipping boy, as long as we have him there's less chance of fighting among ourselves. <ok>

    MR
     
    #46
    MackemsRule, Feb 4, 2011

  7. Nads

    Nads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    38,228
    Likes Received:
    40,069
    Ok, well you be the 'mod', as it were, and i'm happy to acts as a kind of consultant.

    I can't see either of us banning much mind, we're more likely to go after the poster with verbals ourselves!
     
    #47
    Nads, Feb 4, 2011
  8. Steven Royston O'Neill

    Steven Royston O'Neill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    19,511
    Likes Received:
    81
    It looks like MackemsRule and BruceysBeak carry the popular vote so they are our two new mods?
     
    #48
    Steven Royston O'Neill, Feb 4, 2011
Page 3 of 3
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page