Conjecture, your evidence wouldn't stand up in court, but we're on a football forum so make up what you like
I'm saying you make things up to have a bit of a wum, nothing wrong in that, carry on, not as if it isn't obvious though.
No SBFF, I replied to a post suggesting that your next manager needs to be a strong character, to which I pointed why, when Tan has already sacked a strong character. As for wumming, I haven't done that on here for a while now.
Sorry to put this thread back on track but ..... Vincent Tan is 50/1 at most bookies which is the same price as GF Zola and Ian Holloway http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/cardiff/next-permanent-manager
Managers are employed to do the job the owner asks them to do not what they feel like doing. The manager does not tell the owner what to do. No manager in the premier league has lasted more than 2years apart from Pardew (3) and Wenger. There is a good reason for that because they did not do the job the owner wanted them to do. Malky was told to attack more and use our best players, he refused and the Southampton game was his response which in effect told Tan that he would field who he liked and play how he wanted to play. You could say that is a sign of a strong manager but I would say it was the response of a lunatic. jck
On oddschecker they just close down the betting overnight I think, not sure about the individual sites though.
This guy is now third favourite at 14/1 though Datuk K Rajagopal http://www.thestar.com.my/Sport/Foot...-regrets.aspx/ This could be dodgy Put this on the wrong thread
Well someone is putting money on OGS now,, 2/9 with one and did hit 1/10 quickly, is that hopeful betting or a bit of inside knowledge
