apparently Liverpool Fc are investigating him for comments he made on twitter suggesting the twin towers attack were not the work of terrorists. now, of course he is employed by Liverpool FC, but does this mean he has no right to an opinion of his own? do any of us have to tow the party line when employed by others? do we negate our opinions when we work for others? weather you agree with what he says or not, surely he has the right to say what he feels? personally, i find this quite disturbing,he has a right to say what he likes, i mean who decides what we should and should not think or say? your thoughts please. thoughts please?
Entitled to his opinions, no matter what they are. It's not like he's actually said anything explicitly offensive...
he's obviously as nutty as a fruitcake..but its not against the law. unfortunately. should be allowed to make a fool out of himself publically.
whatever he believes, he has a right to say so in my opinion. its up to others to disprove his theories. a wise man once said "i may not agree with what you say, but i will defend to the death your right to say it".
i agree with what you say about him being able to spout his garbage, but how is it up to others to disprove his theories? the evidence backs up the official account of things. it's up up ecclestone to prove them wrong and then put forward ideas that are factually correct. not the other way round. when will tin-foil heads realize it's their job to prove us (who believe in the official account) wrong, not the other way round.
He can say it all he likes to his friends, but why does he have to broadcast his views to the whole world? He knows everytime he communicates on Twitter that he's representing Liverpool Football Club. He could've left his tweet at respecting the dead, he didn't have to drag all this **** up about the illuminati, who in all likelyhood, he knows very little about (if they even exist)
look, weather people like it or not, opinions will vary on any given number of issues. we all believe what we want to believe, and we are all entitled to that. i am not saying i agree with Nathan, let him say what he feels. if you disagree with him, go on twitter and make your case. thats your right too.
i disagree. you have had your say right here, for the world to see, he is entitled to do the same, no?
i think your missing the point bud, argue with him ( or me ) or not, he should be able to speak freely. as i said, who decides what we can or cant say?
Footballers represent their clubs everytime they appear in public though, its not just when they are working. The things they say in public will always be associated with Liverpool Football club, which is why the club are looking into it. I bet he'll get a slap on the wrists and the club will tell him to delete his twitter account. That'll be it.
