1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Mick on FFP

Discussion in 'Ipswich Town' started by johnnywarksmoustache, Nov 17, 2014.

  1. johnnywarksmoustache

    johnnywarksmoustache Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    22,716
    Likes Received:
    9,653
    Taken From TWTD Article:

    Boss Mick McCarthy says he’s still waiting to see clubs punished for failing to adhere to Financial Fair Play (FFP). The Blues are amongst the Championship sides to have kept to the rules, which are aimed at limiting clubs’ losses.

    Championship sides are required to submit their accounts for 2013/14 at the start of December with managing director Ian Milne having confirmed that Town’s losses will be within the required parameters.

    Those who have transgressed the FFP rules will face transfer embargoes, unless they have been promoted to the Premier League, in which case they will receive heavy fines.

    “I keep saying, I’m waiting to see somebody get punished,” McCarthy said. “I think FFP is bollocks, to be quite honest, because it doesn’t seem to me that people are adhering to it.


    “Harry [Redknapp] and QPR, who are supposedly going to get fined, said ‘It’s not financial fair play because Man United have spent £70 zillion’.

    “But it wasn’t for this season [they’re facing a fine], it was for last season when their wage bill was £75 million or whatever and ours was £5 million or £6 million.

    “I’ve yet to see anybody get punished. Manchester City in the Champions League, they can only have a squad of 21, they must really struggle with that with the 21 players that they’ve got.

    “I’ve not seen anybody yet in the Football League that it’s affected and I think it was just looking like it was going to affect people and they’ve upped [the permitted losses] from 2016.

    “We do it the way we do it, maybe because we have to do it and at the moment it’s going OK. And there are others who have spent a whole shedload of money and it’s not. Spending money isn’t always the answer. Burnley didn’t, did they?”

    He says being successful without spending significant amounts of money is particularly gratifying: “I’m like everybody else, it gives you satisfaction when you’re doing well and you’ve not spent anything.

    “If you’re not doing well and haven’t spent anything you’re bleating like a lamb because you want some money because you could do better.

    “When we’re doing well, we’re sort of having a smirk at everybody else who has spent loads of money."

    He added: “But in reality we’re not because we’ve got good players in and are actually paying them decent wages.

    “The players we’ve got in, we didn’t get rubbish on free transfers - Skusey, Berra, Gerken, Bart in the nets, Tyrone Mings only cost a pittance, Kevin Bru, lads who have walked in through the door, Hunty, Anderson, all of them that have come in.

    “We’ve got good players, there must be something about the club and the people who are here that they want to come and play.”

    He admits that he may not have recruited bargain signing Mings, who is now rated at around the £10 million mark, if he had had more money to spend.

    “I might not have got him because if we’d got zillions to spend I’d have been looking somewhere else and not at free transfers or someone who cost £10,000 from Chippenham,” he continued.

    “I wouldn’t have been doing that. Tell a lie, we would have still been looking at him but we might already have done something [with somebody else], so sometimes you benefit from it.”

    He added: “It’s easier if you’ve got money. You know where you can go and get a decent Championship player for a million quid.

    “If you’re looking at paying nothing for him, but you can give him wages, that becomes harder.

    “There are a whole load that you can find. You find them on free transfers but what we’re trying to do is progress as well, not just stand still. And taking a chance on somebody like Tyrone helps us progress.”

    He says it feels great when you unearth a gem such as the 21-year-old: “Everybody’s looking for them and when you find them it’s wonderful.

    “If you think about it, Burnley last year took a lot of people on free transfers and only spent a little bit on Ashley Barnes and maybe a couple of others near the end. But they did it on a shoestring.”
     
    #1
  2. stretchyboy

    stretchyboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    2,480
    Likes Received:
    1,288
    I agree 100% - it is a load of b0llocks, and have always said this. A transfer embargo is a load of crap too. Clubs need to be punished by means of taking points away from them IMMEDIATELY. It's pointless fining clubs as that will just add more financial prwssure on them (which is what FFP was designed to eradicate). If clubs get away with it and are not punished, then other clubs in the future will also disregard the law. We, as a club, have bent over backwards to stick to the guidelines, so if nothing happens, then it's clubs like us that will feel punished.
     
    #2
  3. Guru of Ipswich

    Guru of Ipswich Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,121
    Likes Received:
    485
    Agree its a load of bollocks, what they need to do is deduct 1 point for every million over spent. that will soon get them in line.

    or have a top limit that clubs can spend on wages per season, so say every club can spend 75% of last seasons turnover on wages in the coming season, something like that.
     
    #3
  4. San Diego

    San Diego Sir Mediator Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    41,395
    Likes Received:
    103,334
    Bollocks indeed.
    I've always been quite vocal on this subject and my feelings haven't changed at all. Complete farce from start to finish. It was never going to work because the powers that be don't have the nuts to implement the punishments.
     
    #4
  5. WEIGHTY CRIMSON PLUM

    WEIGHTY CRIMSON PLUM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,852
    Likes Received:
    1,527
    Seemed like a good idea .....but has been poorly executed imo.
     
    #5
  6. Westlake33

    Westlake33 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2011
    Messages:
    5,460
    Likes Received:
    1,187
    Should have been kept as how it was.

    Shows the league has ZERO power when the clubs stick together, just like clubs have ZERO control over players on contracts given to them by the club!

    Sums up everything that's wrong the " peoples game " in a nutshell for me.
     
    #6

  7. tractor bhoy

    tractor bhoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    168
    the idea behind FFP is the best thing to have happened to football in ages unfortunately the FA are only good at doing sweet FA and they are always worried about their product getting tarnished. I think they would rather a few league 1 or 2 clubs went skint rather than upsetting the big teams. Lets not forget we do have 'the greatest league in the world ever' garbage to keep banging on about.
     
    #7
  8. itfcptc

    itfcptc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    4,823
    Likes Received:
    2,345
    Exactly, FFP in principle is a great idea working towards a break even model and it should have been implemented throughout all leagues, the FA need to grow some. Unfortunately until the cash cow of the PL gets under control any solution to any problem in the english game will just be a sticking plaster
     
    #8
  9. johnnywarksmoustache

    johnnywarksmoustache Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    22,716
    Likes Received:
    9,653
    #9
  10. Guru of Ipswich

    Guru of Ipswich Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,121
    Likes Received:
    485
    cue certain budgies saying how we are about to go bust!
     
    #10

Share This Page