The other day RTID posted a thread;- ' Who is winning the mind games? ' I think the following article by Ian Cooper would be the perfect response to that thread. I find it difficult to argue with what Ian's written. http://www.london24.com:80/sport/ch...ach_has_been_flawed_from_the_outset_1_1234418 What do you think?
The QPR Verdict: Why Rangers’ approach has been flawed from the outset Ian Cooper Monday, March 12, 2012 Hoops paying the price for complacency as Bolton defeat plunges them into bottom three Half an hour after the final whistle sounded at an uproarious Reebok Stadium on Saturday, a stony-faced Mark Hughes removed the chewing gum from his mouth and hurled it across the changing-room floor. It was a telling moment from a manager who until this weekend was coolness personified. Until the moment he witnessed his side fall to what bore all the hall-marks of a season-defining defeat. Rangers reached a new low in Lancashire. Floored by Ivan Klasnic’s winner for Bolton three minutes from time, heads fell lower than they have all season – staring downwards, towards the bottom three, and with just 10 games left. Hughes was a man on the war-path, incensed by Clint Hill’s ‘ghost goal’, and by the farcical timing of the Football Association’s call for the introduction of video technology, which he branded ‘laughable’. But however unlucky QPR might have been to see Hill’s legitimate goal missed by the officials, this defeat was equally due to the same old failings; poor defending for both goals and a continued inability to convert chances in front of goal. However, it is also interesting to consider the pre-match comments of both Hughes and his Bolton counterpart Owen Coyle. On Friday, Hughes’s verdict of this game was: “I don’t think we’re at the point of saying it’s a must-win game or a six-pointer. If we acquire the points we’ll keep above the teams below us.” Coyle, whose Bolton team began the afternoon in the relegation zone, said: “It’s a proverbial six-pointer. We have to look to start the game well because we know that if we win the game on Saturday we will move out of the bottom three. That will be our motivation and drive.” It is a striking comparison. To Hughes, this game was seemingly no more or less important than any other he has taken charge of since January. But for Coyle, three points were everything; an entirely different approach from two managers whose teams were separated only by two points. Yet if ever there was the definition of a six-pointer for QPR this was it, a final chance to put some daylight between themselves and the bottom three, before they commenced the final 10 games of the season which will throw in their direction Liverpool, Arsenal, Manchester United and Chelsea. It was only one comment by Hughes – almost a throw-away remark – yet it is symptomatic of the general lack of urgency which has emanated from the club as they have slid slowly but surely towards trouble since Christmas, taking six points from a possible 33. More than one player has dismissed the notion of relegation, while on the pitch Rangers have rarely played at the tempo of a side desperately attempting to fight their way clear of danger. Loftus Road has become more a sandcastle than a fortress, where the hosts have crumbled to seven league defeats. Perhaps this is due to the position QPR have occupied for most of the season; close enough to mid-table to be able to smell safety, but never quite clear enough to be able to throw the shackles off. Lost in a lower mid-table no-man’s land. That has led to ongoing hesitancy. When Hughes took over in January, he inherited a side sitting 17th, two points above the bottom three. Results were poor, but QPR were not cut adrift in the drop-zone, they were merely flirting with danger. Thus Hughes’s situation did not carry the urgency of a team sitting 18th, 19th or 20th in the table, where the imminent prospect of dropping into the Championship would have infinitely sharpened the focus on survival. All season there has been the feeling that a 17th-place finish would do. The board said as much: stick with the status quo; where we are now is absolutely fine, so let’s stay there and no more. The result has been a blurring of targets. On Saturday, a QPR side knowing that a win was not absolutely vital – as long as they maintained their ‘safe’ position of 17th - met a Bolton team hell-bent on victory. It was a predictable outcome. On the face of it, Hughes went for the three points, beginning with two up front and making attacking substitutions, yet the worrying feeling remains he would have happily settled for the draw, a suggestion backed up by his pre-match comments. Ever since the fixtures were announced back in June, nervous glances were cast at the final 10 games of QPR’s season, the nightmare run-in which many correctly prophesised would shape their season. Rangers needed to be clear of the relegation zone – certainly not in it – by the time they faced Liverpool in the first of those games. Instead, they have fallen into the bottom three at the very worst moment. They will almost certainly approach these games with renewed urgency in the knowledge that relegation is all of a sudden staring them in the face. It is hard to escape the conclusion that the damage has already been done.
There's probably a bit of that. The board thought we would survive by appointing MH. And MH thought we would survive with his ability and some cash to spend (with a training camp thrown in). Now the reality is somewhat different, it's like neither party knows what to do.
999, I guess that was in my thoughts when I posted about the mind games. The psychology seemed wrong to me at the time. To be fair to MH, he may have been simply trying to take the pressure off the lads in order to release them to just play to their ability. Of course, a first goal to the away team also changes the psychology of the game. Had our goal stood, we would now be lauding MH for his cool approach in taking the pressure off the team because I believe we would have gone on to win it. "It's not fair" is an over used phrase and I feel like a 7 year old standing in the playground but genuinely and absolutely, "It's not fair"!!
Let us not forget that he probably learned it all from the master of mind games, spin and bullshit ... Sir Alex Ferguson. (but SAF does it better!)
Hughes seems intent on finishing 17th on the last day of the season rather than pushing to get us further up to a possible 15th. He took over with enough of the potential wins still left to make this a possibility but a series of events such as red cards, clown referees and missed goals have left us ready to drop. I reckon Hughes needs to chuck a few fecks at the team and remind them that it is their fault we are at the bottom of the table. If he has the balls to do it then Sparky needs to make Barton top of his "could do better" list. He also needs to have the cohones to drop players who are not performing including Barton and SWP.
I just cannot believe that Warnock was sacked and replaced by Mark Hughes.If you look at the records of them both then choosing one to get you out of the situation you were in was a no brainer.The only serious mistake Warnock made was signing Barton.Hughes has just blown a load of money on players who don't appear to have helped the situation.You lot appear to have signed the captain of the Titanic and his first task seems to have been to spot the iceberg,his second to ring down for full steam ahead.
Neil, who I love, signed Barton, Ferdinand, SWP....Dyer, Bootroyd and DJ Campbell, and Gabbidon.. I still would go with Sparkys team over Neils (Sparkys team contains Hill, which Neils wouldn't have) to get us out the mess PLEASE
I'd go with Sparky's team but when it come to motivation, passion and a manager who puts his heart and soul into it, Sparky's not even in the same class as Neil, who never got the chance to spend the money that Sparky's had. Having said that, the most destabilising thing that's happend to this club is Barton, who unfortunately Neil was scraping the bottom of the toilet to sign, and then seemed to be unable to control. The only positive thing about relegation is that he may go forth and tweet somewhere else, and a sense of harmony may one day return to our dressing room.