What I don't get is that he says 1) it definitely wasn't a red card and 2) the only reason that it wasn't overturned is because the TV angle wasn't clear enough to show that it was an error. Now, unless I've missed something, what ****ing angle has he seen then? Assuming that all he's seen is the TV angle, he admits that it's not clear enough to overturn, so how can he be so certain that it was a bad decision? If it was that obvious the panel would have overturned it, and his two statements can't both be right
Looks like Lambert i a bit of a sore loser .... "Ipswich Town manager Paul Lambert has been fined £1,750 for comments after their League One loss at Lincoln last month. Lambert admitted a Football Association improper conduct charge relating to comments about referee Kevin Johnson. The official awarded a penalty against Ipswich which saw them lose 1-0 at Sincil Bank on 24 October."
