It’s the connection I believe to the thigh. Not 100% certain. But he’s had the same issue twice. He’s young enough to recover but how comes we have players who are always crocked. Then you look at Man City for example and they never seem to have injuries. Haaland is a perfect example. He’s elastic.
Weren't there concerns about Haalands Injury record previously or have I imagined that? I seem to recall it being mentioned that he picked up lots of muscular Injuries
Haalands injury record is way worse than Isaks. Chaos spouts some utter **** at times but this one has really left me baffled.
He's played how many games this season? 3 the lads always out with something even if it's just illness. The signs are that he's made of different material than Joelinton for example.. agreed? In around a years time I will remind you of this, but you'll never acknowledge it. Much like when you said I was a ****ing idiot for suggesting psg were in for ekitike....you're now saying I talk **** because you don't agree with an opinion. **** you roly yeah you miserable moaning old ****house And happy new year also mate
If he’s not played at least 30 times by this time next year, I’ll eat my words. Ekitike is still ****.
He's at psg though yeah so I was right... he's starting also I believe the follow up was he'll never get off the bench . We all have opinions mate doesn't mean it's talking **** .. thats football theres no position if certainty.. its why we debate mate
Isaks build is very slender aswell. He’s young enough to get good. But his injuries are a concern for me. Some players just are injury prone for some reason. You only need to look at Wilson. He’s always injured.
Well I think the facts and stats don’t back up your argument. The Haaland comment wasn’t yours as such but is a good comparison. Time will tell as always.
Yeah that's really why I'm saying ideally a good solid no 9 would be ideal .. I'm not writing isak off but he's definitely not tough
We can do whatsbout this and that all day but the fact is he's had injuries that have so far caused problems and not just here. I agree the books not closed but right now the page says always injured . Would you at least agree that Wilson max him being relied on doesn't bode well and that what I originally said having a maddison like player and proper no 9 and and am that can play right and left would be ideal? That was the crux of my comment .
Isak just had a nasty injury but he'll come back strong, time will tell whether he stays regularly fit after that. Haaland has a bit of a Duncan Ferguson thing about him, ie unstoppable when he's fit, but always looks like he's gonna pull his hamstring or "pick up a knock".
Whilst I respect your opinion the stats just don't support the idea that Isak is always out with something, granted in his time here he has been so far but his overall career he has rarely been Injured.
