I have been asked to create a forum for debate on whether the multitude of legal twaddle passed off as statue from not606's real lawyer (allegedly) is genuine law or a hastily googled attempt to stave off the panic and appear to have some credence. I would like to state that I am undecided on the matter and this thread has been requested, as thus I am merely a conduit for debate on this issue
Mr Haig sir, I recently slipped in a dildo at work and hurt my butt hole, do I have grounds for a claim?
Today has been very damaging for not606's Perry Mason. He'd slowly been burying the humiliation of s106gate and then he goes and ****s it all up by getting involved in a discussion about libel. What a plum.
Hiag do you do dodgy claims* for car accidents as I might have whiplash ? or is PPi claims* your thing ? *paperwork processor
He's one of those masturbating monkeys who's given a call list every day and targeted with trying to convince some pensioner that he/she's owed PPI payments!
conning money out of old people is disgraceful, they are so vulnerable. Hiag should be ashamed of his actions and hand the money back
HIAG is value, as he has a seemingly endless ability to make himself look a compete ****. I've rarely seen a poster who legs himself up as often and as embarrassingly as our chubby karaoke King. Today was fun
So you've abandoned the Remi Garde thread's attempt to grab his attention and just gone back to Plan A, then?
