Fans behaving badly

Imagine the fuss if these were Chelsea fans

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...ield-during-defeat-to-liverpool-a6926361.html

 

I know. Even after posting a few instances of Man Yoo racist fans, the plastics still think their fans are brilliant. Now this at Anfield the other night? Classless low-life plastics.

 

How would they know? We've been to Old Trafford far more than them.

My favourite was 86, Dixon double ended their title hopes and then our scum nazi fans scattered the Stretford too. Naughty naughty

Their amazing fans on Thursday
In plastic shirts too, given by the club
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co...ws/manchester-united-fans-urged-wear-10989212

 

Ha yeah I remember that. As I've always said, they're plastic to the core.

 

Their fans have got away with it for years,just like wet sham fans have.
Chelsea and Millwall fans always the most stick and its usually out of proportion.

 

To be fair to the Manx, going to Liverpool was much rougher in 80s.

Best supporters in the world my Arse!! You get separated from your mates up there when you are 14 and see how friendly they are!

Funny season 85/6. We ended up beating West Ham to effectively end their title challenge and then rolled over for Liverpool to give them the title. Evertonians not happy

 

I'd guess exactly the same amount of fuss as has happened.

 

I see your team have opted to give plastic scarves away today instead of shirts, ****ing cheapskates

 

Nowhere near it to be honest.

 

It's been widely condemned and discussed across a variety of media outlets. I know it's easier to pretend there's an agenda against Chelsea but there really isn't.

 

In your opinion. All I know is that it hasn't been as widely condemned by posters on this forum.

 

Well my opinion is the logical one

 

Yeah, it would be.

 

Assuming your opinion is the opposite of mine, what logical reason would there be for media outlets having an agenda against Chelsea?

 

I was actually referring to the posters on this forum. Ok?

 

Convenient edit.

 

[QUOTEyou."Watford_R, post: 9022389, member: 1006911"]Convenient edit.[/QUOTE]
Thank you.

 

Thank you.[/QUOTE]

That one wasn't so convenient.

To answer your point- it's most likely a result of the actions of regular posters on the site. If United fans regularly acted like cocks on threads/boards with multiple teams' fans, in the opinions of most other fans on those threads, perhaps it would have been discussed more. Likewise, if certain regular Chelsea-supporting posters did that less, less would likely be made of incidents about Chelsea.

 

That one wasn't so convenient.

To answer your point- it's most likely a result of the actions of regular posters on the site. If United fans regularly acted like cocks on threads/boards with multiple teams' fans, in the opinions of most other fans on those threads, perhaps it would have been discussed more. Likewise, if certain regular Chelsea-supporting posters did that less, less would likely be made of incidents about Chelsea.[/QUOTE]

Fact is that the United incident wasn't discussed as much as the Chelsea incident. Whichever way you dress it up, that is a fact. That is the point I made Now, I know that you like to jump to the plastics defence at every opportunity,but this is a fact. You are now calling people names to lash out after being proved wrong.

 

You said people haven't discussed what the United fans did as much as if it were Chelsea. I offered a very valid theory as to why that is. Rather than the cop out of 'you would side with them anyway', why else would it be?