1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

David Cameron

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Mick, Jul 22, 2013.

  1. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,657
    Likes Received:
    30,915
    There will likely be a way to do it on your account online. Probably be able to switch it on and off.
     
    #81
  2. Gambol

    Gambol George Clooney's wee brother

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    60,610
    Likes Received:
    18,285
    <laugh>

    They won't be able to filter it anyway. That's the biggest joke of all.
     
    #82
  3. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,657
    Likes Received:
    30,915
    Maybe they can do it as to make it almost childproof?
     
    #83
  4. Mick

    Mick Probably won't answer PMs Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    11,325
    Likes Received:
    926
    Nah, the Chinese Government throws a lot of resources at it and is failing miserably.

    In Singapore there are ISPs who sell a US VPN as part of their broadband package, to quite obviously get around the Singapore Government's ban on porn and gambling.
     
    #84
  5. The Raging Oxter

    The Raging Oxter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2010
    Messages:
    31,025
    Likes Received:
    4,561
    Some sort of twisty plastic cap?
     
    #85
  6. Deleted 1

    Deleted 1 Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    19,443
    Likes Received:
    3,690
    ST's just leaked a Government secret <doh>
     
    #86

  7. Gambol

    Gambol George Clooney's wee brother

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    60,610
    Likes Received:
    18,285
    The problem is actually discerning the naughty stuff.

    They can't just block know sites - they'll change their IP addresses.

    So what they going to do? Examine content in transit looking for pornographic images/videos? Good luck with that. Not workable technically never mind the huge cost of implementing an attempt at it.

    Controlling content on the internet could be done. But it would mean changing the way the internet works and enforcing some kind of digitally certificated licencing scheme upon every machine connected to the internet. This would be the end of freedom of speech on the internet. Governments would now control it. Which, let's face it, is what they're really trying to do.

    In the meantime to protect yer kids the only reasonably effective way to do it is to be in control of them and what they access. Basically, looking over their shoulder the whole time. There's plenty of net nanny software out there ye can install that is supposed to restrict what they access but it doesn't work very well and kids become quickly adept at bypassing it.
     
    #87
  8. Mick O'Toon

    Mick O'Toon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    34,151
    Likes Received:
    27,867
    #88
  9. Gambol

    Gambol George Clooney's wee brother

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    60,610
    Likes Received:
    18,285
    <laugh>.
     
    #89
  10. Mick O'Toon

    Mick O'Toon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    34,151
    Likes Received:
    27,867
    <laugh>.

    Nevermind a child,I've had trouble with those ****ing caps meself<steam>
     
    #90
  11. Erik

    Erik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    25,004
    Likes Received:
    3,066
    It'll be the same thing as with the ban on Firstrow - spend 5 seconds finding a non-UK proxy site to perform your search through.

    Cameron must be the worst Prime Minister since Gordon Brown...
     
    #91

Share This Page