What would you lot make of losing Walcott but signing Darren Bent? a gooner mate was crapping himself at the thought so I wondered what others thought
Oh and why exactly would we replace one our wide players with a guy that can only play through the middle?
I can't imagine Villa pay him crazy wages. He did cost them dearly though, and he's 29 in February. He'd be more suited to a 442, could link well with Giroud, but Arsenal don't play 442. He does score goals, but his team play is suspect / none existant. Allegedly he might be available for as little as 7m.
Would rather play afobe than bent and I'm sure you've never heard of afobe! Actually considering his nature i wouldn't take him for free!