Crime - part deux.

still haven't disproved the 6 point i noted because they are true and proves Starmer lied when he said it wasn't terror related he is now trying to reduce his sentence I've just heard

 

it also says the case referred to did not include any Rwandam men so meaning the accusation is false .

 

Like Starmers excuse for not prosecuting Jimmy Saville, as heard in question time he said It never came across my desk, leader of the CPS didn't know about the biggest story going, he is a professional lier

 

So you've moved away from Starmer representing the killer's Dad then, Wodge?

You're now clutching at the definition of terrorism?

OK - so please state which prescribed terrorist group Axel Radubakana was part of?

 

thats because he invaded Rwanda from another country there were hundreds of them recruited

 

answer my questions first you weasel

 

If I understood them I might, you gerbil.

 

so how do you know Starmer represented him ?

 

Kier Starmer didn't represent the father of that killer. The only Rwandan (spelling?) was a woman.

 

I read it which has now beentaken down
So how did he manage to get into our country legally when he was denied entry, Starmer the barrister represented him and won, and anyone who says he didnt show me who the barrister was who represented him

 

I think that's what the debate is lol.

 

the father was an invading force of 7,000 troops, so he wasn't Rwandan,

 

So was the father one of these...

The High Court document makes clear that Sir Keir's clients were a 16-year-old Ethiopian girl, a 26-year-old Iranian man and two Angolan men aged 22 and 33.

The sixth party - the only Rwandan national involved in the case - was a 42-year-old woman.

 

basically you just making **** up as you have an agenda

 

Oh I should say for bantz, I used the same source...Daily Malice.

 

"Justice Goose confirmed the offences did not reach the legal definition of terrorism because he did not kill to further a political, religious or ideological cause."

So Starmer is to blame eh Wodge?

 

Yup ...

Could have avoided reams of unnecessary posts with just:

"I hate Keir Starmer"

 

How Axel Rudakubana's church-going parents are linked to the Rwandan genocide - from his father's army experience during 1994 ethnic killings to connections to the current ruling party

His taxi driver father, Alphonse, is thought to have fought with the Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA), an armed force that fought the Hutu government and eventually brought an end to the murders.

The 49-year-old is said to have been an officer in the RPA, which invaded from nearby Uganda.

The Rwandan genocide saw an estimated one million people shot, beaten or hacked to death with machetes during just over 100 days of violence that broke out in the east African nation in 1994.

The killings were sparked by the death of Hutu President Juvenal Habyariman, whose plane was shot down on the night of April 6, triggering a rampage by Hutu extremists and the 'Interahamwe' militia.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...illings-connections-current-ruling-party.html

please log in to view this image

 

... my money is on the 42-year-old woman.

 

So how does this make Keir Starmer at fault for anything?