http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport...ally-buy-this-stuff-lets-take-a-look.18857922 interesting reading. but obviously i am obsessed.
The thing is Charliie Green has been busy over the last couple of weeks building a strong team of ex huns to build his case for Sevco. Speech writer Bomber Brown. Green just had to have Bomber on his side after listening to some of his rants at Hamden and at Ibrox. Green won Brown on his side by telling him how useful Brown's £40k had been and he would maybe return £50k someday. Financial Adviser Craig Whyte. Young Whyte had become a multi billionaire with wealth off the range and him so young, it was natural for Green to want him on board. Whyte wanted to be involved to look after his assets ( Murray Park and Ibrox). Historical Adviser David Murray. Green wanted him because of his incredible links with Scottish Media and influence on the top people in Scottish Football. Dave, just wants to protect whatever name he has left and advised Green that really they didn't have a leg to stand on. Current media adviser. Ex Chairman Johnston. Johnston knows the "facts" Rangers got their licence in 2011, after the Rangers friendly G.Peat and Campbell Og failed to ask sufficient and correct questions and Rangers gave abbreviated answers. Green plans to continue that strategy, however Rangers don't have a cosy conscientious with the top people no more and more intrusive questions will be asked and will require more explanative answers. Tea Boy. Ally McCoist. Ally wants to be involved because he wants to be seen to be important. Green wants Ally there because if the going gets tough Ally has friends that can help. Transport Manager Sandy Jardine Green wants Sandy for his knowledge of the whereabouts of 36 and a half clubs. Sandy's love for Rangers is go great he could pawn all his medals. Sandy reminded Charlie that he was unable for any walks/marches until sometime after Sept29th as he was committed to marching in Centenary Marches for the signing of the Ulster Covenant. With a team of real Sevco Loyalists like that surely Green cannot fail. To be honest I don't know if any Celtic fan wants Sevco to fail in this battle. Celtic fans do not want to take their awards of them. The goals they have scored or the distinction of having the biggest home attendance in the 4th tier of Scottish Football. They are entitled to those.
Reply from Roger Mitchell. For someone who claimed the Scottish Premier League was a really bad idea a few weeks ago, I found myself surprised that I felt the strong urge to defend my former organisation in the face of the bombast from Charles Green. I truly hope by the time that this is read, someone officially representing the SPL will have done likewise. I ask myself, does Green actually buy this stuff? Let's take a look: Claim 1 Rangers ceased to be subject to the SPL's rules when they were ejected from their league. Fact Rangers oldco was not ejected from the SPL. The fact that Rangers went into liquidation automatically expelled them from the league. The SPL shareholders then decided not to make an exception and let them back in. Two very different things. Claim 2 The outcome of the SPL's process will have no legal effect. Fact What the SPL are deciding upon is whether their tournament and their trophy was assigned to the correct club in the years in question. The SPL have every right to examine whether participants in their competition behaved within the rules. And if they find they haven't, they can apply their rule book as recourse. More Green nonsense. I do, however, agree with him that "whatever decision they reach is a decision of the SPL". Indeed. But the SPL should be proud of that, and not hide behind the Law Lords. The SPL are examining the conduct of the participants in their competition well before Rangers went into liquidation, in particular the conduct of the club then owned by Sir David Murray, with the club secretary role (in charge of those player registrations) held by Campbell Ogilvie (whatever happened to him?). Charles Green and Sevco have nothing to do with this. Whatsoever. Claim 3 The new owners purchased all the business and assets of Rangers, including titles and trophies. Fact Green said on June 2012 that if his CVA proposal was to fail (which it did) and Rangers were to be liquidated (which they are), "the history, the tradition, everything that's great about this club is swept aside". Therefore he admits he has not purchased titles and trophies. Sevco has no titles and trophies. By the way, Charles, I would not provoke commentators like me to dig this up, because what you said is not what the Rangers fans want to hear now, as you now correctly realise. Let it lie, Charlie, let it lie. So, even one with a leaning towards Govan would argue that, under the most superficial scrutiny, Green's attack is less than robust. But sometimes you have to chuck a dog a bone. So, to be fair, Charlie is right with his complaint on the SPL's lack of consistency, Green states: "The SPL took part in discussions regarding the new company's league status, where 'the EBT issue' would be dealt with as part of a package of sanctions which would be implemented in return for membership. "We do not accept that people who are willing to come to an agreement on such matters then have a right to instigate a full-blown inquisition when matters do not unfold as they thought they would." Sadly this falls into the general shambles of the management of the affair by the SFA/SPL. I made my own view clear on the leadership of both bodies in the summer. But I cannot see how the credibility of the current process on a simple point of law over false registration of players with Employee Benefit Trusts (being handled by independent top QCs) can be derailed by claims that the prosecutor behaved incoherently months earlier. Good debating point, Charles, but it's not enough. Instead, all of us who love the game and who hold true sporting values in our Hearts (SFL3 feeder club) have a simple question: Did Rangers oldco gain unfair advantage by registering players on a basis where their full employment conditions were not declared to the SPL/SFA? In my mind the answer is undoubtedly 'yes'. But let's not forget the lessons of Versailles: bloodlust rebounds. The SPL enquiry punishment doesn't arouse great passion in me. And it shouldn't either for Celtic fans. For them I'd argue the victory is in the fact that their greatest rival died. The 125-year long struggle ended with the collapse of the adversary. The war was won. Achilles vanquished Hector. In closing, from Mark Anthony onwards history tells us that well-crafted oratory can influence the mob. While Charles Green is no great speaker or statesman, I must admit, he is no dummy. And there is no doubt that his audience is the mob, whose money and favour he needs in order to exit the Rangers investment project with a financial return. Stoking up hatred has always energised "the base", another example of which we saw in the Republican convention in these days. Well done, Charles. Initial Public Offering of shares here we come. For Scottish football, the days of enlightenment around the Tommy Burns funeral are long gone, and I fear the worst.
