And £puds say we only started dominating them post Roman. Not only are we ahead of them, we are 100 odd points ahead of the zone 8 Middlesex outfit http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...tml?ito=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
All time...since when is the prem all time? Without doubt since 19964 or 95 chelsea have been a better team than us we were **** between 92 and 2006 with just 1 top 8 finish in that time ....but ... Ah ****...I just took yer bait...
Imagine if we hadn't been so **** against Arsenal and West Ham in the 90s. We'd be coasting that league.
So the only reason Spuds get to 200 first is because of the fixture list and them playing another London team before Chelsea or Arsenal
[h=3]Premier League all-time London derby table [/h][TABLE="class: article-table, width: 1055"] [TR="class: article-table-header bogr1, bgcolor: #F5F5F5"] [TH="align: center"]Position [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Team [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Played [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Won [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Drawn [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Lost [/TH] [TH="align: center"]For [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Against [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Goal Difference [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Points [/TH] [TH="align: center"]Points per game [/TH] [/TR] [TR] [TD]1 [/TD] [TD]Arsenal [/TD] [TD]199 [/TD] [TD]103 [/TD] [TD]55 [/TD] [TD]41 [/TD] [TD]338 [/TD] [TD]190 [/TD] [TD]148 [/TD] [TD]364 [/TD] [TD]1.83 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]2 [/TD] [TD]Chelsea [/TD] [TD]199 [/TD] [TD]99 [/TD] [TD]58 [/TD] [TD]42 [/TD] [TD]329 [/TD] [TD]196 [/TD] [TD]133 [/TD] [TD]355 [/TD] [TD]1.78 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]3 [/TD] [TD]Spurs [/TD] [TD]199 [/TD] [TD]62 [/TD] [TD]63 [/TD] [TD]74 [/TD] [TD]255 [/TD] [TD]279 [/TD] [TD]-24 [/TD] [TD]249 [/TD] [TD]1.25 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]4 [/TD] [TD]Wimbledon [/TD] [TD]78 [/TD] [TD]23 [/TD] [TD]22 [/TD] [TD]33 [/TD] [TD]85 [/TD] [TD]113 [/TD] [TD]-28 [/TD] [TD]91 [/TD] [TD]1.17 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]5 [/TD] [TD]QPR [/TD] [TD]60 [/TD] [TD]17 [/TD] [TD]18 [/TD] [TD]25 [/TD] [TD]61 [/TD] [TD]74 [/TD] [TD]-13 [/TD] [TD]69 [/TD] [TD]1.15 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]6 [/TD] [TD]West Ham [/TD] [TD]164 [/TD] [TD]51 [/TD] [TD]35 [/TD] [TD]78 [/TD] [TD]183 [/TD] [TD]256 [/TD] [TD]-73 [/TD] [TD]188 [/TD] [TD]1.15 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]7 [/TD] [TD]Charlton [/TD] [TD]76 [/TD] [TD]23 [/TD] [TD]15 [/TD] [TD]38 [/TD] [TD]90 [/TD] [TD]127 [/TD] [TD]-37 [/TD] [TD]84 [/TD] [TD]1.11 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]8 [/TD] [TD]Fulham [/TD] [TD]114 [/TD] [TD]25 [/TD] [TD]31 [/TD] [TD]58 [/TD] [TD]116 [/TD] [TD]183 [/TD] [TD]-67 [/TD] [TD]106 [/TD] [TD]0.93 [/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]9 [/TD] [TD]Crystal Palace [/TD] [TD]47 [/TD] [TD]10 [/TD] [TD]13 [/TD] [TD]24 [/TD] [TD]41 [/TD] [TD]80 [/TD] [TD]-39 [/TD] [TD]43 [/TD] [TD]0.91 [/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] This is most interesting as I for one thought we would be much further ahead of the spud's
They do well against the smaller London clubs but poorly against Arsenal and Chelsea so it's not surprising really. We have struggled against West Ham, Chalrton and QPR in the Premier League era.