Off Topic Aliens

I don't want to go into this with you as you have nothing to offer, however its going to lead to you doing my head in so let's kill this now with one question(which I have provided as evidence for you prior but you have completely ignored)

The SAI originated from where?

 

I think its time to come to the universal understanding where you all agree to disagree and leave it at that.

 

Yeah we established what atheism means, its what atheists have took to arguing is the discussion I am having with PNP

You are not atheist you said so its not really an issue with you

 

Which is what? In your eyes

 

Mate I was happy to leave it, but the guy is like a leach so here we are

I know it won't lead to anything but him squirming, making accusations whilst doing what he is accusing me of but at least it will keepnit here and not spill over to other threads

 

I laid it out in my post to PNP, have a read

Or is this where we argue about me writing it again etc etc?

 

This is what is so frustrating about Internet debates....because what you have just said there hasn't happened, even remotely.
Typically all internet debates end the same.
Both sides speak their minds and then claim "victory". It's hilarious

 

The difference is that you can apply what a religion says about a topic to someone that follows that religion.
I may not know what a particular Christian believes about wearing mixed fabrics, but I know what it says in the Bible.
Atheism has no equivalent.

Someone saying that they accept scientific explanations for our existence and origins wouldn't even have to have an opinion on abiogenesis.
They could accept it, reject it as unproven or even be completely unfamiliar with the concept.

 

Paganism.


Your only 'evidence' is as ever 'god said'.

 

I've patiently stuck to the topic, and then drifted along answering as you tried to drag it all over.

I'm happy to do that, as every reply simply highlights that you follow a fraud of a religion, that stole it's 'traditions'.

 

Except I am not saying that.

Interesting how if you and me denied that ahmadiyya or shia were not Muslims the response would be ah its interpretation and that would be pages of argument how it should be clearer, you and I know it is and that is what makes the distinction

 

I suggest you read back and look to what we agreed and how it went, do it honestly and get back to me, also take into account other peoples responses to the guy on other threads

 

Indeed.
I don't know every theory about scientific subjects or what is the general consensus of every field.
I doubt anyone does.

There's generally batshit elements in all quarters of life.
I heard some guy claim that Dinosaurs and Man walked the earth together and that the carbon dating of fossils is a Satanic conspiracy amongst scientists to discredit god

 

No o explained origins of SAI in religion

Now you need to show its origins in paganism, as per your claim

That's how discussion works

 

Nope. You explained someone saying 'god did it' It's not 'evidence'.


It's all occured before your religion.

 

What position does he hold in the US government?

 

I realise that people do not like DMD's views, especially on the Politics thread.
I personally think the guy talks sense a lot of the time, although his debating style is very off putting and needs some work.
I think the whole "You answer" "No, you answer first" thing is hilarious.

 

haha, he was some pastor or reverend or some such at some big church organisation in the US.
How did you guess he was American?

 

This doesn't happen, the arguments getting presented are mainly christian theology to a Muslim, a Muslim who isn't Sufi or barelwi so doesn't adhere to certain concepts

However the main issue is still that atheism is a lack of belief in god, religion is a belief in a creator science doesn't deny or necessarily support either.

 

It's a very American viewpoint. Their society is being heavily undermined by fruitcakes.