Who knows what goes on in the mind of the deluded cvnt who has compared himself to Alan Turing? For the past year or so Bowyer and his team have allowed us to put his poisonous ownership to the back of our mind, because our love of the club has been reborn. But now the chickens are coming back home to roost and we are reminded of the pitfalls of his penny-pinching policies. Bowyer is a rookie manager who is experiencing a series of setbacks, and now has to send out a team without Cullen, Gallagher Williams and Taylor. I can't believe some fans want a change of manager.
has anybody considered that a change of owner would be preferable to a change in Manager?... just putting an option out there
But didn't our CEO (yes we used to have one) tell us that every change of manager had been successful?
If changing the Manager is always successful then think how successful we would be if we changed the Owner
US private equity firm buys 10% of Man Citeh for £389m.... the Belgian only wants £60m for 100% of Charlton... a bargain! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50570117
The December away games against Boro & QPR look huge. Two teams that will be around us in the table all season. We need a minimum of 4 points from those two fixtures. Ditto to the two home games coming up against Huddersfield & Hull City.
Indeed. With away capacity limited to a couple of hundred at some grounds, you'd need 8 million loyalty points (& Valley Gold of course) to stand in a puddle next to a bloke with his dog.
I think it's a bit unfair to call chaperonek9 a wum. And he posts about once a week on average - a little more often than once every three months. I think his post went a bit over the top, and I don't agree at all that Bowyer has lost the dressing room. But I believe the opening post was genuinely meant, even if it was perhaps typed in an over-emotional state (just after the humiliating defeat to Luton) or possibly when the author was somewhat the worse for wear. We can disagree with the contents without discrediting the poster.
OK, once a fortnight then, or whatever. He has posted quite often recently. And If he was posting once every 3 months chaperonek9 would have posted 22 times, rather than 145 Anyway, why is an occasional poster automatically more likely to be a wum?
