good to see tremmel making the most of his opportunites. dai is out and out a swan, perhaps liverpool are his second team. huge match wed night 1-0 swans
Dont count on it Dilli, `Pool are the benchmark according to the thoughts of Chairman Dai? We are going to have to play a lot better on Wed. to get anything from WBA, they are playing great at the mo. Liverpool Dai`s second team !!!!!. Whenever he goes on about them, he should always have this proviso on every post. please log in to view this image
By the time we play them again there should be several points and 3 or 4 places in the table between us - just based on the teams playing to their mean. 'Pool lot will be on antidepressant meds by then so they will either be socially better adjusted or too drugged to type. Also expect their club to be significantly poorer based on their profligate spending habits and inability to acquire value for money talent. Just a guess .
You missed out "and everyone in Britain, in Europe and in all continents of the world including both poles. Everyone in the galaxy, the universe and the solar system and even God himself" (sorry paganswan) You've also missed the point that no one gives a f*** what you think
I havent commented so far but the above quote has convinced me that Dai knows absolutely nothing about football. So tell me about the chances they were creating at the end of the game that had us hanging on. If anything Liverpool probably shaded the first half, But i seem to remember that all the pressing in the second half was done by the Swans. On chances and the balance of play the draw was a fair result. So for you to say it was 2 points dropped for liverpool and a point gained for us shows again that you have no clue about football. This post has really wound me up and i know it shouldnt, but you just speak utter nonsense. I know you are probably doing it for effect and it has worked. Were you one of the fans kevin Johns spoke of Welcome all Liverpool fans, who have travelled a long way for the game, from Mumbles, Gorseinon and bircgrove. Was he talking about you dai.
Guys, look at it this way. You have Liverpool fans and some so called Swans fans, coming onto our page in an attempt to justify, (by saying how everyone , pundits, press thought they deserved to win.) How the once Mighty Liverpool failed to beat Little Swansea. Revel in it. Deep down they know who is doing the best at the moment. This once great club is sliding away and looking at what i watched on Sunday will continue to be no where near the top 4, which is where their deluded fans think they should be. Since we humbly took our place among the so called elite we have played the mighty liverpool 4 times in thoughs games we have won 2 and drawn 2 scored 4 conceded 1. i will take that everytime. if only we could have a season of playing them, we would probably be in the champions league.
I missed that, but you've got to love Kevin Johns I called in the harvester for one before the game and overheard a local guy in a Liverpool shirt ask a group of scousers "how long did it take you to travel down?" one of the scousers replied saying that they left at 5 in the morning etc to which the local butted in "it only took us 20 minutes to get here" to which the scouser hit back with "yeah, but we're proper fans". I didn't hear what came next as I downed my pint and turned away with a bit smirk on my face
yep liverpool were the better team>>>>u cant argue with that can you>>>>>i`d say twas a good point for swansea and shows where abouts liverpool are at present>>>>>thats out of the euro places which isnt good enough for a massive club like the pool.
liverpool were not the better team they had the better chances and a bit more technical than us and they had a goal disallowed that other refs would have given...I like the truth and if a team was unlucky against us then i would rather accept that than remain deluded...liverpool was a bit more technical than we were and the longer the game went on the more likely they would score before us, Tremmell saved the day on a number of occasions and with the goal that should have been given then i have to agree with the football writers that we were glad of a point and liverpool should have won.....If some of you were not so bias you will actually get much closer to how the game went than all the rubbish you are saying how it went...we played well we had our chances but on the day liverpool looked more likely to score than we did and thats what i expected with liverpool and their more dangerous front players with suarez and sterling....We have to be very happy with a point after that game.....
dai can you read your above post again butty, just the first six words on the first line and the last line of it please.............so liverpool were the better team
Dai i have watched iy back again. i think we backed off to much, but to cite a goal that was disallowed as a reason as to why we should be grateful for a point is Ridiculous. The goal didnt count so that shouldnt be even considered or talked about. It was offside simples. Other than Sterlings effort and 1 other. tell me what good save Tremmel had to make, because i cant remember him scrabbling to turn a shot wide or having a header being cleared off the line. on good chances we were even and the result was fair. I also disagree that they were better texhnically than us. I agree suarez, sterling, Enrique and Johnson looked technically good. But no better than, Hernandez, Michu, chico or dyer when he came on. so for me Liverpool didnt deserve to win and neither did we that was the fair result.
I thought both teams were poor, just that we edged it in the poor stakes, had we been up to standard, Liverpool at their best would never have lived with us at home, I'll be very surprised if Liverpool get past 8th position, come end of season! That's my take girls....................... please log in to view this image
You know exactly what i mean, we gave them a good game but at the end of the day they were unlucky to have a good goal ruled off side that was proved on MOD and they hit the post and were more dangerous than we were going forward...It happens teams are going to come to the liberty and be a bit better than us. If it was not for the superb display by tremmell then there would not be any argument. we played some good football but as the game went on liverpool showed more and looked if they were the home team, It was a very hard point earned and i can understand why liverpool think it was 2 points dropped for them......Thats football. we will play a lot better and lose before the season ends thats for sure....Brendan came with a game plan and it nearly worked but we had to have a bad decision from the ref for us to get a point and i will take that any day of the week....some you get some you dont and you have to be happy it went our way this time...
I recorded the game and watched it back last night. It was proved on sky sports that it was offside, and it's plain to see.
It was a perfect timed goal.michu's left foot played him on side as have been proved....it happens im not complaining, it will happen again many times and some will go our way and some wont...thats football..
It was offside, it did not count and Liverpool have still not scored a Premier league goal in 3 attempts against us. Only a Liverpool or a Cardiff fan would think it wasn't offside
There's no way in the world he was onside, half his body was offside. As was said on sky, it was an excellent decision
Your not actually agruing that he was actually onside? Your like my wife, hasn't a ****ing clue about the offside rule.
