So why say it? Why call the thread "100%" and ask a question about teams giving 100%? Because you are a mong.
I wasn't aware that the title of every thread had to be a direct quote to what someone had said. If you don't think that 'not competing' can't be interpreted to mean 'not trying' or 'not giving 100%' then there's no point debating with you or your bum chum stereo any further. That's certainly how Jim Jeffries interpreted it.
I love the thought that you, Jim Jeffries (that intellectual giant among men) and one deranged Hearts fan interpreted it that way. What a brilliant club to belong to: Wolsey, a manager who can barely speak English and a ****** who'll be in the pokey soon for trying to assault a football manager in front of millions of viewers! What's the opposite of Mensa?
That's your own ****ing interpretation of what someone said, in this case Neil Lennon. If you are of that mindset then you could imply anything you like but it does not mean that you are correct. Which incidentally you are not.
Here's a better idea, why don't you contact the Oxford Dictionary mob and tell them you have a new definition for "Compete"? Maybe you could also explain why you put "not competing" in between those quotation marks?