Separate names with a comma.
Those are two different points. Those players in particular are why we're 21st and not 24th tbh.
When we start getting results, they might be considered good signings, but until then, they've been part of the **** and sadly, will be tarnished...
Good old Lucy.
That'll just be one or two people chucking a score on.
Mainly because he’s never existed .
I actually thought we had a tricky start on paper - the ‘winnable’ looking fixtures’ were predominantly away from home so not really that...
Ours is out of the loft, FACT.
Marco Rose (who isn't going to come) is 25/1 :emoticon-0133-wait::emoticon-0133-wait::emoticon-0133-wait::emoticon-0133-wait:
Scienza is a good signing. As is Jander. As is Jelert. That's not even subjective, surely?
Booya. Come on boys
I wouldn't be calling any of them good signings right now. We're 21st in the table. They might be good individual players, but right now, not a...
But it’s not a stat if the specifics don’t pan out as expected, it’s a guess <laugh>
Without a doubt
I didn't notice Rotherham v Burton in the original list. But then sometimes I don't notice any of them <laugh> Rotherham 1 Burton 3
Get the Christmas tree while your up there.
