Recent content by Spevin Casey

...and he has claimed ignorance. Reeks of scapegoatism. I'd LOVE a level playing field in the Terry case. A fair comparison. But conveniently, we won't see that. John Terry will get FAIR n TRANSPARENT TRIAL...you know, like law.

Sensible Rus, I know. 8 match ban - on one man's say-so. Extraordinary. I don't know another football player ever to be labelled an "unreliable witness" either. Again, extraordinary. Why no witnesses? Why no representation at the meetings? Why no transparent report? Lengthy ban - why no...

Agreed then King, Rus, et al. I'm an evidence-based sort of a guy. This obvs smacks of scapegoating then. Passed sentence. Why not sooner? Where is the explanation?

"that Suarez was charged and found guilty" - THIS IS NOT EVIDENCE IS IT????!!

Rush...no bleating. You're onto context and language barriers...as close-minded as the kangaroo court itself. It was as derogatory as Evra's comment in Spanish....you know something else?

...because he has received "sentence" Eric... Leads to the question - what is the purpose of the appeal window? For the FA to gauge public opinion?

Then you understand why people are so anxious to see evidence then Eric? To go along with kangaroo court is NOT ok? - that what you're saying????

SHAM. Agreed. AGENDA. Defs. PREVIOUS - yup, no "witnesses" this time eh? Shut up shop. Closed ranks. I sincerely hope the FA are hanging themselves with their own rope here. The Terry outcome goes to the Met eh? Least he'll get a fair hearing then...but depending on what the FA do to Terry...

Ok, calm down Sky. The length of ban is VERY relevant. It justifies everything everyone is saying to you. Are you happy to go along with what one person has uttered to a ref who then scribbled it into a notebook? Is that evidence enough for you Sky? Is that justice Sky? I'd like more...

Make your feelings known to them. Or simply ask "when"...You deserve to know that much, don't you? Evidence "when we feel like it...(we have the best PR in town trying desparately to spin this one)". Ludicrous.

@thefadotcom Okeydokes, some of us feel a tad embittered today. Let's do something productive. Lay siege to this piece of **** twitter. I have ONE question...evidence "in due course"...WHEN??? Should the FA want to maintain one scrap of integrity, they would publish immediately...

@thefadotcom

"more rigourous burden of proof". Clear, concise - and, to my ears, in a moral, legal, ethical sense - fair, saintanton. I suspect the FA's statement will be nothing of the sort.

Ding...ding...ding dingding! Five star. Spot on. A fkin joke.

...is it any wonder some Liverpool "fans" are just now starting to see the worth of Charlie Adam.