The EU debate - Part III

I'm not surprised you want to gloss over your complete hypocrisy being proven

Hey ho.

 

I'm not glossing over anything, feel free to carry on if you want.

I'm not denying insulting Spain, I would argue with the "scared little englander" it was his gloves that came off first, however if you think that makes you the winner, where should I send the trophy?
You on the other hand, wade into any argument, throw a few insults around, try to take the moral high ground and claim that all others are demonstrating hypocrisy.

 

Wrong again. I don't take the moral high ground on that issue at all, as I chuck insults around like the best of them.

What I take issue with is others cry arseing about 'abuse' when they're no better themselves i.e. You.

Happy to help

 

Completely different subject but there's a piece on UBER on the BBC website. Might be of interest to you.

 

Again when have I ever claimed that I am better than anyone else when it comes to insults and I'm certainly not crying. Within reason a Internet forum is fair game as long as people who can't defend themselves aren't dragged into it, like Spain's good lady, then "all's fair in love and war".
You do seem to take issue with a lot though, whether that's subject matter or people. It generally ends the same way with you trying to take the moral high ground by insulting others. Ironic isn't it?

Sorry but you'll have to find another way to help, if you're really concerned

 

Do you talk complete bollocks for a living mate?

As you've got a definite talent for it

 

And I pointed out that growth was higher before the 2008 crash. I never claimed that there had been no growth.

I accept that not all leave voters are bigoted little Englanders. But the fact remains that they were the ones that swung the vote and gave leave the advantage.

And if this going to represent your posting style, I.e. Spouting crap about things you have limited knowledge of, don't be surprised when people bite back!....

I'll give you a clue. When you and Steven were having Your little spat about driverless cars, I and several other posters stayed out of it. Why? Because it's not our subject and we would most probably not be able to add anything constructive.

Perhaps you could learn something?....

 

Seems apt to repost this clip that the people that should, won't watch.

 

It's called answering the question, you should try it sometime, instead of sticking your beak into other people's conversations and trying to break people down with your inferiority complex.

Run out of argument....hurl insult........repeat!

 

As it seems to have been diverted a tad,... the Deutsche Bank. I see they're being looked into over a few more bits now too.

[/QUOTE]

 

Oh the irony.

Dull will like that post though

 

And this one, not that anyone will watch it, but it'll see who took on board the socialists comments.

 

I will now you've shown it gets your bottom lip going stumpy.

I see you've reduced another discussion into exchanges of personal abuse wee man. It seems churlish not to respond in kind.

 

[/QUOTE]

He skipped past the fact that they have £250BN worth of readily sellable assets

It's troubles are largely self inflicted but it'll get out of them. This won't be Lehman 2 imo

 

Oh hello right on cue Dull clambours for the moral high ground

Shocked here Sarge

 

Any comment on this Dull?

 

Have a day off from being an arsehole stumpy, it doesn't add anything to the discussion.

 

Another stupid **** trying to claim the high ground whilst doing exactly what he's whining about.

Thick as ****

 

He skipped past the fact that they have £250BN worth of readily sellable assets

It's troubles are largely self inflicted but it'll get out of them. This won't be Lehman 2 imo[/QUOTE]

Oh aye, all the reports show it's in fine fettle.

 

Oh well, it was just a thought, perhaps you'll take the day off tomorrow little fella.