The EU debate - Part III

5% increase is not 50%

 

As long as I dont have to pay for you to stay in, thats fine with me.

 

Thank you for that insight.

 

You're OK. You don't need a passport to holiday in Wales

 

So you now admit it, good for you

 

Yes, Kustard. I admit that 5% isn't 50%. Do you admit you don't have a clue what anyone has been talking about for 1000 pages?

 

So to make it clear,
Lib Dems got 3,606
In last GE they got 3500 and extra 106 votes so as I have said from the start before you come up with your defection crap 5% of nothing is nothing.

Back to your question, I have more of a clue than you.

So back to your safespace, your head may explode

 

Is someone defecting?

 

Everyone has been talking about their share of the vote from the beginning you dolt. The turnout was minimal this time compared to the GE and they still got an increase in their absolute number of votes, not that anyone was discussing that.

106/3500 isn't 5%

I'm not expecting you to defect.

 

No they were not, but who cares

 

You are making a fool of yourself

 

Yes, they were. If we are talking absolute votes then the Tories lost nearly half their voters.

 

Kustard paints quite the picture. An illiterate, mathematically challenged, caravan holidaying, 4th Dan, probably called Wayne.

Rule Britannia.

 

Not at all

 

Always Kustard.

You're so thick that you don't realise how thick you are

You're Jeremy Kyle material.

 

Your thoughts on Dylann Roof?

 

More like defecating.

 

Here's a video for you to ignore, or reply with a 'so what' or 'post your view'. .

It's not news, but doesn't seem to get much coverage on here.

 

Is watching 22 minutes of stuff like that how you fill the couple of hours a day that you're not cut and pasting far right nonsense on here?

Your thoughts on Dylann Roof?

 

What the **** does that have to do with the video you boring ****e?

To try to stop you babbling on (not that it will) It's not something I know too much detail on, but on what I've read, there is no justification for doing what he did in slaughtering innocent people. His justification of trying to cause a race war can't be condemned firmly enough.

It's no surprise a ****e like you that takes joy in tragedies for asylum seekers tries to use another tragedy as a feeble point scoring exercise on message boards. It's also no surprise that some don't condemn you, and others even try to defend your shameful actions.

Now the tedious arse has had his bit of attention, perhaps someone would post their view on the problems in the EU banking system some are desperate to stay in.