I've been locked in a waredrobe for the last 6 months, have the Allams lived up to expectations and sold the club for a pound yet?
No they were lying. And they're now getting rich from the club. You could say it's The Lying, The Rich and The Wardrobe
If the allams have made statements that have totally been contradicted by prices increasing (some drastically ) that billboard is totally justified lets not nit pick Bottom line is there full of **** and parasites
Ehab hasn't made a statement that is contradicted totally by the cost of membership. He said the club couldn't continually raise prices and for a significant minority, perhaps even a majority, the cost of a season ticket/membership has been significantly reduced. Does that make what's happened right? Of course not, but the poster isn't about forcing families with children, the disabled and pensioners to pay for the reduction in cost for adults of non-pensionable age with no children. It takes one example and implies the club has done nothing but increase prices for everyone. The poster raised the question, at least for me, of what the Trust are going to do to try and get concessions back. Having highlighted the problem in such a public way I'd expect them to restart their campaign to try and get the current system changed before the family guarantee for the South Stand runs out.
It won't change without a change of ownership and that's why the campaign is now aimed entirely at regime change.
Not especially. Cherry picking specific scenarios just ignores other ones, and in this particular instance, the scheme is bad enough as it is without giving people the ammo to defend it.
"The club may come out and say that, although they haven't commented yet If they do then great, it opens the door for interviewers to pull their answer apart and really get to the bottom of things. Unless they pull apart the figure of £570.00 which in the given scenario is one of choice, the Father wants to remain in his seat. If the example used figure was £336.00 I would not have posted anything. Even if he moved to the cheapest area he would have to pay significantly more. It's factually correct. Its also only correct in certain set of circumstances It's an appropriate tone. I agree It's focussing on targeting their credibility. No problem with that. It's focussing on putting one of the many lies out in the public for all to see. I understand the message and have no problem with it. It's all good in my mind...I look forward to the next in the series."
As I sadi on the other thread a good marcomms can pull it apart. For that much you could buy both tickets, for dad and lad. In fact, possibly, as long as dad moved it could have been a club marketing ploy. not that they do them. It was 600 quid just for dad last season. This season he can take his son and still have change from 600 quid.
How much did a five year old new season ticket holder pay last season to sit with his Dad in E5? How much will a 5 year old new member pay, over a year if he wants to join today & sit with his Dad in E5? * Pick away. Stipulations. Try to answer with the two correct answers. Try an answer that doesn't have your head buried deep between Allam butt cheeks. Try not to think about the benefits you may lose by answering correctly. * Answer on the assumption that the Allams don't use their 90 day right to increase the monthly cost of a 5 year old sitting in E5 with their Dad.
To me TOM has answered it and correctly. What is the Trust doing to ensure a 5 year old new member can sit with his dad or mother in E5? OLM seems to be saying we have to wait until the Allams have gone before we can do anything, is that the view of the Trust?
