Bloody hell That's the game to be in I might knock some up for the front garden. Cut price £400 a fortnight with a massive discount for anti Allam posters
Actually if you want to advertise things to Chazz then you should definitely pay for my new front garden billboards He's always screeching past, horn blaring!
It's an old trick, Daffy lies on the ground with her legs in the air, but it's a trick, she'll have your life ... ... wasn't Daffy a bloke duck?
Might have been, it was just Daffy in what remains of my memory banks and it seemed it might have been a lady duck......Quack.
What about one of those advertising trailer boards? I know a place just round the corner from Beech Tree where we could park it overnight
In addition to the £500/fortnight as OLM said, production of the poster itself costs £159. If anyone wants to contribute to further banners etc. The best thing you can do is join the trust. If you already are a member or would like to do something else, there's a donate button on one of our old website blogs. I'll try and find it.
Here's the link: http://hullcitysupporterstrust.com/hcst-protest-plans/ As I say this is an old blog so it's well out of date, but the donate button is on there and anyone wanting to contribute to further campaigns can do so using that button.
I am surprised by the use of £570. In my humble opinion. It leaves the door open for the club to point out that no family group has to pay more this season and that they should not sell a single membership to someone under 16. The groups affected by the changes are those family groups were there are more under 12's than adults (1 Adult, 2 or more under 12's and multiples of that) 16-22 year old's and over 65's in the West Stand. All of which are a relatively easy fix and this should in my opinion be the target. I support the external protest against any increased cost of attending games for ANY supporter and I consider that the club got elements of the scheme wrong, but I do believe that using £570 is a mistake.
Ah well the club used the cheapest adult option in the recent BBC survey, so it's only fair for The Trust to redress the balance by using the most expensive kids option
They won't do that, as the family guarantee was only for this season and it's under 15's who need to be accompanied by an adult. Not that it matters, they're refusing to comment on it at all.
Does it redress the balance or could it be said that it is as misleading a statement as any the club have used?
