The EU debate - Part III

Don't I? It still doesn't take 15 minutes to post, which was your claim.

Do you always just go for tedious personal ****e?

If you've neither the time nor the interest to watch it, ignore it. Don't just babble on about **** all, it's dull.

 

I know that you're just spamming these articles at a rate that shows that you're not reading them, but why that one?
What does it have to do with the EU or even politics?
Do you think it's a good thing? A bad thing? Why?

 

Ouch!....

 

Pointing out your hypocrisies is a good way to kill the half time break. You're essentially Kustard with a secondary school education.

 

So you keep posting replies that say nothing, and think that highlights 'something'?

You're either ridiculous, or 'hypocrisy' is another in the list of words some on here don't understand.

Funny how some avoid discussion, and drag things to tedious personal exchanges, and then try to blame everyone else.

 

If you really want to go down the pedantic route, I didn't claim it takes fifteen minutes to post a clip.

My replies do say something. You just live in a deluded sense of reality where you're some sort of intellectual to be revered so no one may dare point out what a sad grey man you are.

 

He has had lessons off Sad Stan.

When nobody listens to him, he just throws the personal insult.

 

You really aren't helping your claim, and you're being as dull as **** in the process.

 

It's a regular trait from quite a few of them on here. Although they try to blame everyone else.

It says quite a bit about the strength of their argument.

 

It's in your interests to have this conversation go round in circles as it fills the void of your afternoon. I'm going back to the game- enjoy YouTube

 

It's you that's done that you thick twat.

You could have just posted your view of the content or ignored it, instead of dragging it down with this childish obsession of yours.

 

Do they even have an argument?

 

If you're going to be a pedant you should really check the accuracy of your claims before you make them. It is in your interest for the thread to go in circles, regardless of who (you) is pushing it that way.

I've given one opinion on the clip. It's your clip and you still haven't, as usual.

 

Not generally a credible one. See the reply above this (and now the two below it) for the usual bile filled, tedious bullshit that passes for 'debate'.

On occasions, when the bile peddlers shut up, a decent discussion breaks out, but the bulk of replies contain little.

 

Not in a thousand years would I click play on any link posted by you

 

****.

 

Why would you call Sad Stan that?

 

He doesn't watch them either, to be fair. Reads the title somewhere else, lobs it on here without any comment.
Pete does the same with his Mail and Express links.

 

Gives him something to do with his day.

 

Pretty sure Pete is a spambot. A **** like that can't be real can he?