The EU debate - Part III

That's OK then

 

I reckon Pete would go for it.

 

I think that we've all been pushed to the edge by ****ty Christmas music at work, to be fair to him.

 

Boris Johnson was reportedly backing it earlier today, though he's denied it since.
Or he's doing another u-turn. Hard to tell.

 

Only if you can see a full moon

 

You only allow in people if they have a job to go to and they have a place to stay and insurance to pay for any health care

 

That's not freedom of movement though, obviously.

 

That is not freedom of movement

 

Its is of sorts, it stops the riff raff from coming

 

No, it's not. Think about the words 'freedom' and 'movement' and let me know when you're there.

 

France presidency: Francois Hollande decides not to run again
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-38173350

another socialist failure

 

Which EU country could you move to with no job or income, and get funded by the state?

 

I've no idea. Is the answer the UK? Your question has little to do with what was being discussed.

 

It does, you just need to think.

 

No, it doesn't, no matter how snide and condescending you try to be about it.

 

It's not snide or condescending, it's simple honesty.

Here's a clue. http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-iii.335684/page-924#post-9968114

 

Kustard making up a new definition of freedom of movement, which doesn't include the freedom, has nothing to do with a debate on the terms of Brexit.

How many winky faces are you away from winning?

 

So you'd be happy if we had the same system as other EU countries? In what way do they differ from ours?

 

Theresa May banned from end of year dinner with EU leaders at major Brussels summit next week
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ed-end-year-dinner-eu-leaders-major-brussels/

 

Why not just give the answer if you know it?