The EU debate - Part III

Wrong.

 

No it doesn't. We had more immigrants from outside of the EU last year. Pen is talking about 10,000 a year maximum

You're talking absolute bollocks

 

It's a big a load of bollocks as the nonsense about a coppers hat. Have a look at the arguments of some the half dozen your rallying as support.

I couldn't give a ****, and you popping up with your tedious childish abuse is unlikely to change that.

Why not try arguing me away with rational discussion? It'll need a tad more than your usual vague ramblings of doom and gloom though.

 

I never said we didn't.

What percentage of the worlds population live in the EU?

 

FTFY

 

So how do you conclude that Le Pen's immigration stance is the same as the EU's?

As it isn't

 

That's exactly what you're doing. I've explained why you're wrong repeatedly.
Your response is to repeat yourself and pretend that nothing's been said.

 

I'm basing it on the information t'other expert on here provided.

We both agreed we wouldn't support her,as she was only leaning slightly left of the EU, who restrict access from 90% of the world.

You'll have to badger him for the finer details, he's the expert.

 

Not really, you've explained your view, I've offered mine. It doesn't mean you've explained where I'm wrong, as I dispute your version for the reasons I've explained.

You can be a semantic as you wish, but it's a simple fact that people we didn't elect stopped our government enacting policies on the domestic front, and they did it so that their people get an opportunity to take money from our benefits system.

 

It's not semantic, you're just wrong. It's not a domestic policy.

 

So you believe our system of benefit payments is not a domestic issue but one run from the V4 countries. I think on that, we hit an impasse.

 

More dishonesty. Can't say that I'm surprised.

 

I've never claimed to be the expert. You'll have to clarify why the National Front's immigration policy is to the left of the EU's. I suspect it's a similar argument as yours on how racists would vote Remain.

 

You made the assertion not him, and it's bollocks.

Happy to help

 

Interesting choice of phrase given your other comments on mimicry.

I was basing my 'no' decision on t'other guys expert opinion. I'll ask him to clarify and see if he can convince me it should be 'yes'.

 

You never claimed it, but I just assumed you had deep knowledge with your firm assertions on your views.

 

Well if you won't give any details, then it's impossible to give any credence to what sounds like a pretty improbable scenario. You seriously believe that you have been discriminated against in various areas of the UK? I had assumed you are a white male, apologies if I got that wrong.

 

You posting from your seat at the KC?

 

Keep up, it's not the KC.

**** knows what that has to do with brexit though tedious.

 

You can believe and assume what you wish. My argument is that the whole debate on racism is flawed as it stifles debate and leads to division. I'm not sure where you're heading.