Match Day Thread Liverpool V Sunderland - Premier League

Need the 3 points and need to get the goal difference up.

 

Might was well forget it lads. sky has declared we will finish 5th and arsenal 1st.

Apparently their analysts have done the maths.
Its lije that football whispers thing. they are never wrong are they.

 

Where/when did sky say that? On what basis?

 

Today and it wasn't their analysts it was a computer that runs the season 10.000 times, taking into account current form, who teams have played, who they have yet to play (and where), results against said teams in the past, week by week past performances and many, many other things.

I'm just glad it wasn't the BBC, it could have been taken as some sort of bias by the insecure few.

 

I am just glad it wasnt on RAWK otherwise it would have been considered as some sort of meaningless nonsense based on ratings and form etc, whereas this one is more realistic as it is based on.............erm ??????

 

What utter nonsense!

So where did they put the mancs then?

 

You should know my opinion of things like this by now

 

So like what happened over many seasons past and against many teams not now in the same division has a bearing on where a team will finish at the end of the current season?


http://www.skysports.com/football/n...e-champions-liverpool-unlikely-says-predictor






Leicester City?



And surprisingly they don't take into account change of managers/players over those seasons, its no surprise that man u are ranked 6th because the stability of Fergie is no longer there, but yep, we're gonna finish 5th in 6 months time because a computer program said so.

 

Way back

I wouldn't worry too much about it, I don't think Leicester got predicted to be champs last season

 

**** sake, they ran a program which reacted to the data put in.
If you had come out on top would you all be moaning or would you take it dead serious then

 

We've gone almost 27 seasons without a title, and you think I'd believe we would win it if a computer programming said we would, I will believe it IF and when the referee blows the final whistle at a game were we can't be caught mathematically.

 

You say that as though your opinion is of some relevance,why?

 

You seem to follow me a lot and even have one of my posts as a tag line. I really thought I meant something to you

 

This prediction has chelsea winning the league- fair enough I would imagine they will be thereabouts.
They have them winning it with 71 points! My arse.

 

Only as an object of ridicule, as per said tag line.

 

I know, i messed up typing sold for 50 and bought back for 50 (anyone following that thread would have seen the big numbers i used with a M behind them and known it was a typo) , easy to do when watching TV at the same time but fair game

You never did explain how a player plus cash transfer meant to the club buying, the sum of the players worth and cash was +ve net spend but, if they sold the player to a third party then used the cash to buy another player the cash received from the sale went into the -ve side of "net spend"

 

A typo is generally a spelling mistake, you defended it at the time and later claimed you were drunk, make your mind up.

 

I just don't understand your maths from reading just the post in Traore's signature.

You've said -30 + 50 - 50 = 20 from the way I'm reading it?

 

Do you struggle to read as well as with numbers? I have never said i was drunk and am very unlikely to

Typo was probably the wrong description, **** up would have been more accurate but since the page or two prior to that had all been correct i took a liberty by using typo

 

You needed to read the two pages prior where i said bought for 30, sold for 50, bought back for 30 then you would understand i made a booboo when typing and watching TV at the same time for the post in his sig.
Everyone knows the figures involved so it means little but was fair game for a sig