The EU debate - Part III

It was in response to a comment made earlier to that, and that custard was referring to.

I think it just shows you're another in a line of sadsacks boring people ****less by looking for an argument where none exists.


You'd be better asking the guy who said "....
If you were to ask the population whether Sarah's Law should be extended to the public as a whole, then it would probably pass.
That doesn't necessarily make it a good idea."

 

Aye up, here's tedious tobes spreading more bullshit in the hope some falls off him and sticks elsewhere.

 

You always do the questioning eh Sarge

 

I sometimes correct ****witted, desperate ****ers when they try to rewrite things to evade their **** ups, if that's what you mean.

Do you find these feeble exchanges as boring as others that read them, or are you a bit 'special'?

 

Of course you do Sarge, you never spend hour after hour boring the entire forum rigid as you swerve, deflect and post utter drivel to avoid actually saying what you mean.

I can understand why you hide your opinion behind cut and pastes and rarely pass comment, as when you do, you make yourself look a right ****, as you're not very bright.

 

If only there wasn't many posts with me posting an opinion, you maybe wouldn't look like a sad desperate ****er, trying to cover another of your **** ups.

As you seemingly don't find these feeble exchanges boring, and you're certainly needy, it seems you are also a tad 'special'.

Move on tedious, you're boring.

 

please log in to view this image

 

Your reply was linked to custard, not PNP. Stop squirming and answer "why not in Tottenham.

 

please log in to view this image

 

It's not squirming you thick tart.

My response was in reply to Custard, but it related to the spuds comment on Sarah's Law. I posted his comment to show that's why I posted my reply.

You're looking in the wrong place for the answer. Ask t'other spud, it's his comment ffs.

And no, before another boring tart pipes up, he didn't mention it being only in Tottenham.

 

Because people from tottenham dont like Europe (see football team)

 

Don't be confusing the poor lamb. He needs all his focus to remain offended and outraged at his invented slur.

 

Nietzsche and the doctors are all wrong!

 

That was pointless, inaccurate and unfunny the first time you used it.

It's not improved with repetition.

 

"If the only way you can keep a discussion going is by refusing to answer a direct question then you are a ****."
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844 - 1900)

 

I am not a thick tart. Even if you did post in reply to PNP, which most of us do not believe, you still haven't told us why it was seemingly not in Tottenham

 

Is it because Tottenham is a ****hole?

What do I win?

 

.

 

Yep, Tottenham is definitely a **** hole.

 

Something on which we can all agree