The EU debate - Part III

You just keep confirming that you're an ignorant bigot. You even seem proud of that fact.

 

You're literally repeating this bullshit over and over like it makes sense.
Grow up and try and actually offer something or just stop. It's embarrassing.

 

As I've said. If the NF, or the Neo Nazis make a video, i dont need to see it to know it has a hugely biased agenda.

If Russian state media is making a so called critique of the BBC, I don't need a pipe and deerstalker to deduce that it's going to be biased towards whatever message Putin wants to get across.

As for Russian state media having the brass neck to criticise other media sources for being slanted, let's not even go there!..it's laughable!...

 

You just keep confirming that you're an ignorant bigot. You even seem proud of that fact.

Stop hiding behind the media that posted, and post your considered opinion on the issues raised.

 

Post an opinion on the issues raised, and stop hiding behind the media that posted it.

 

Go to bed, Dull. You're boring
And as PNP has alluded to, you're just making yourself look pigheaded and stupid!...

 

You haven't raised any issues. You've spammed crap and ****posted.

 

Why do you cry when asked to post an opinion of your own?

 

It's a change from hiding behind the source, but still no opinion of your own on the issues raised.

 

Amazing how the bias RT media let it air and then published it on their channel on youtube isn't it.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig-considine/muslims-are-not-a-race_b_8591660.html

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...-racism-dresden-protests-germany-islamisation

@The Zlatan

And remove or resize that ****ish oversized sig you annoying blurt

 

Wait, I thought that not discussing the content of videos made you an ignorant bigot?
Aren't you going to talk about the Russia government bankrolling the whitewashing of Putin's actions?
No mention of the reporter saying that the channel that she works for is biased, just before she quits? No?

 

I can't prove something which isn't proveable. It would be easier to prove it wasn't true. I'm giving an opinion as you constantly drone others should while you give nothing as you drone others do.

 

If you think about my reply, it actually does make a comment on that.

 

I think that was someone else. Still, it's quite a simple question to answer. Why do you demand others challenge content you give no opinion on yourself?

 

You're not really giving me an opinion, you're making a comment on a newspaper rather than on the issue I made, and you can't back up your comment anyway.

 

Because not long after this started, i posted several opinions and added a comment that some fool would crop up later suggesting I don't make opinions.

So, lead by example, post an opinion of your own on an issue.

 

No, it really doesn't. It's a shame that you think it does.
The link's an attempt to insult and belittle her, if you read the description.

 

If in some parallel universe there was some really good journalism in the Mail, the ludicrousness of the rest of it would cast doubt on it. That's why the source is important as you bizarrely don't accept.

It's an opinion just as it's my opinion the sun will rise in the morning. I've got nothing to back that up either.