Well if we use your accounting system, liverpool have spent around 1/4 billion in the last three years so where..........ah feck it! we all know what you are like when it comes to maths so what is the point of continuing?
But using your system you have spent nothing because the players you sold to raise the money don't count, their value is only taken into consideration if used as part of a player swap apparently.
Koeman has said that........ "So turns out Koeman's job at Everton is to keep Lukaku. Not improve Everton, win a trophy or get into the CL... as long as they finish midtable but with Lukaku in the squad then he's succeeded" As you stated?
The first part yes... I may have made assumptions that if that's his main target then the others are not as importantly. Process of elimination and all that
His main target certainly isn't the league/european qualification where after being humiliated by Chelsea he shrugged his shoulders and said it's "only 3 points"
But we didn't lose 0 points we lost 3 which was what Koeman was saying bad day at the office move on... Using Astrologic it doesn't matter we lost by so many anyway it's only the 1st goal which was the actual winner as we didn't score so the other 4 didn't count? So as far as I'm concerned we only lost 1-0 quite close really considering we were playing against one of the favourites for the title.. As far as I'm aware there aren't any players in the Chelsea team libel to slip so if they are actually up there they should see it through and not bottle it IMO. ..
TBF if koeman manages to finish in midtable and keep lukaku, then you would have to regard that as success. what more are you expecting?
That wouldn't be your idea of success for your team so why should it be for ours? We expect better than last year and better year on year but as you know it's not always possible that's why managers get changed from time to time..
I forgot about that one mate ha ha.... But for the purpose of this thread only and to suit my agenda he didn't slip Wayne Bridge shot him lol
Thing is that slip really did cost them whereas Stevie G's was just another factor ... that's what I tell myself .....
