The EU debate - Part III

That would be a no then...

 

And, a yes for you, you pointless idiot....

 

Grow up.

 

I'll 'grow up' as you all it, when you stop posting cretinous tripe!...

 

Would you like another attempt at this post?

 

Firstly you've chosen to ignore all the stats (not mine) and made nonsensical accusations without base, in your opening paragraph. Secondly, I've not passed anything off as my own.

And finally, you honestly can't see the glaring error in your 90% and 5%stat? The reason why quoting mass grooming is misleading is because you're quoting 1400 odd offences committed by these men, which may very well be a high percentage in itself BUT committed by 35-40 muslim asian men So... and here's where your whole disingenuous argument really falls flat..... it's 35-40 (**** it lets say 100 muslim men and really go over the top) amounts to 0.004% of the asian muslim population in the UK Even IF we take the number of muslim asian offenders and compare it to the total number of offenders of child sex assaults, it equates to 5% of offenders, which tallies nicely with them being 5% of the population as YOU'VE pointed out

Goodnight fella

 

Good read.

Gave likes to all the posts ripping into Zlatan. That was fun.

 

No. You posted cretinous tripe and I pointed it out.


Ok?...

 

I think he meant the typo mate.

 

While 35-50 blokes groomed them they were made to have sex with 100s more, so goes from 0.004% to 0.01% a big increase.

 

cheers mate. But if the only answer he's got is to try and point out that I missed a letter off of one word, it says a lot about his level of intelligence.

 

I see Zlatan has been continuing with his white supremacist campaign, ably abetted by Kustard.

Zlatan is clearly a religious nut who thinks his god is white but Kustard claims to be non religious (despite his comment in my sig). What motivates an atheist or agnostic to think that whites are superior to other human beings?

Safe bet that this will be answered with the use of the words snowflake and safespace (sic).

 

Fair shout mate.

 

The mess that the government's child abuse investigation has become hardly makes good reading.

In my view, a significant issue with Rotherham and the other Asian ones was the media and Police being fearful of a backlash and allegations of racism restricting the investigation.

The government inquiry into the involvement of high officials, either directly or aiding in a cover up is so badly flawed, it's understandable that there is speculation and suspicion of high level obstruction to protect people.

It shouldn't be about race, position or politics. It's about right and wrong and protecting the vulnerable.

 

I recall that the media made a big thing about the fact that Jimmy Saville, Stuart Hall and Cyril Smith were white Christians.

Actually on reflection, I don't think their skin colour or faith was ever mentioned!

Rapists are rapists.

*****philes are *****philes.

Brexit means Brexit.

 

Where are you getting the hundreds more figure?
The National Crime Agency have said many of the 300 names being investigated have turned out to be duplicates, nicknames or street names. They have also said that not all the names given are being accused of abuse, but that they might have been aware of the abuse taking place and needed investigating to see if they helped facilitate the abuse carried out by others.

We won't know any more until their enquiry is finished. What these people did is dreadful and the failure to investigate due to fear of being called racist was appalling, I hope all those involved are castrated.

 

The people who do these things to vulnerable young girls, or boys in some cases, are scum.

****phillia is one of the very worst of all crimes, IMO. Not only because it involves taking advantage of young, vulnerable children or youths, but because it ruins lives. Many of the abused are ****ed up for the rest of the their lives due to the sick perversions of these people.

I do agree though, as Stan has pointed out, that there is no need for the likes of the Fail and The Excess to keep highlighting when they're Muslims.

 

Iny view, a factor in why this has got 'messy' and has failed many victims is the erosion of a clear idea of what our values are as citizens of Britain.

One value we should all share is that we would protect the vulnerable and tackle the abusers without fear or favour. We seem to be failing in that in several areas.

 

Should they fail to mention when the accused is a politician or celebrity too?

 

No,

if they're a celebrity, it would hardly be necessary, would it?..

The mention of a person's career hardly equates to the gratuitous mentioning of their faith or ethnicity.