The EU debate - Part III

Thats because the other group are blinkered and live in the past

 

Explain why you've concluded it's illogical, you patronising fat mess

 

They would quite happy kill every none Muslim first.

 

Are you seriously suggesting the Mail doesn't have an Anti-Muslim agenda?
Because if you are, then you need to stop talking, because you have nothing worth saying.

 

Bodinki said: "Only ****ing morons would equate ISIL with the whole of Islam. And only because Right Wing ****ing rags like the Daily Mail push that narrative."
I asked him to justify his comment but he was unable to.
Yet, he says it's my fault!

 

The stats would disagree with you.

 

No Pete, you asked me to justify my comment.
I did.
In your opinion, it wasnt a jusitification, yet in a lot of peoples eyes, it was.
If you do not see what is in front of you, then yes, it is your fault.
Not sure if anyone has told you this, but your opinion is not fact, no more than mine.

 

They are extremists, if you are not Muslim (in there vision) they kill you.

 

They kill everyone who isn't ISIS.
Muslim or not.

 

Your statement was: "Only ****ing morons would equate ISIL with the whole of Islam. And only because Right Wing ****ing rags like the Daily Mail push that narrative."
Stop deflecting. Can you justify your statement - yes or no?
How does the Daily Mail equate ISIL with the whole of Islam?
I know you are not able to justify it because it is simply not true.
All you can do is talk about something else and try to ignore your lies.

 

My opinion is logical but yours is not

 

They only kill fellow Muslims that dont stick to there version of Islam

 

That's just piffle and bigotry to try to reinforce an inaccurate stereotype.

The terrorists have been drawn from muslim communities here.

 

Again, in your opinion.
The Daily Mail loves to point out the fact that these terrorists are muslim.
It has sensationalist headlines like:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Muslim-terrorists-warns-community-leader.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-racial-equalities-chief-Trevor-Phillips.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...les-sentenced-lives-misery-Muslim-courts.html

It screams of an agenda, or at worse it is highly irresponsible.
I have seen them report on muslims who are not terrorists too, for sure. but they always have sensationalist headline like this....its pathetic.

 

Which is pretty much all muslims (Except for those in ISIS)
Like I said, they kill anyone who is not ISIS.

 

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

 

Yes, I know.
But Pete spams this thread with their articles on a daily basis.

 

There is no hope.

 

So if the Daily Mail describes anybody that means they mean that everybody with that description has done the things mentioned in the news item?
For example:
REVEALED: "North Carolina parents who featured on Extreme Makeover: Home Edition 'gave AWAY their five adopted children after getting home of their dreams' "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...dream-home-renovation-show.html#ixzz4QAOSUNzU
Bodinki must think that the Daily Mail is saying that anybody who appears on TV shows will give away their children!
He justified his criticism of the Daily Mail because they will say if a terrorist is a Muslim therefore his argument is that the Daily Mail is saying all Muslims are terrorists
He must think that because a cow has four legs then all animals with four legs is a cow
I'm glad I don't think like him
He is seriously deluded and wouldn't pass the first logic test in a philosophy exam

 

You would though with all those O levels.