I thought Giuliani was lined up for Attorney General?
He's being rumored for both spots.
I thought Giuliani was lined up for Attorney General?
Imp
McClusky made the point over the weekend that the problem isn't immigration but that employers are importing cheap labour in to communities wholesale and this is undercutting the local labour market. As you say, there is a race to the bottom with the way that some companies are run and I think that the disconnect is that the economy is being made out for the benefit of the few and not serving the population as a whole. It would be very easy to getting these working people on board and, as you concede, it is totally correct that by catering for the need to be "on message" with "marginal" characters like Izzard, the liberal parties are failing to address the problems of society as a whole.
The reason why people don't belong to Trades Unions is simple. Margaret Thatcher sought to confront the more militant unions and effectively emasculated the whole movement in one fell swoop. I have always thought that unions need to recruit all workers and that , in turn, the unions should be in the second house of parliament and not the Lords. Whilst I would concur with some opinion that some industrial action seems petty (especially to those of us who work in the private sector where people routinely work in excess of the hours of the ublic section which is the most-unionised) , if the unions looked at the broader picture and somehow organise themselves to your "race to the bottom", I think they would have the answer and could, with the help of a Labour Party that supported them for once, actually make far more sweeping and just changes than those promised by snake-oil merchants such as Farago. People are crying out for proper representation in parliament and the void is so easy to fill that it is so frustrating to see the political parties floundering. Every "Ed Stone" or Harriet Harman's ridiculous pink bus is a nail in the coffin of a credible , "liberalist" political party.
A step back in time to closed shops. I know not everyone will agree but I'm glad they are illegal in this country. Freedom to choose whether to join a union should be protected in my opinion. Keep unions out of politics so they can concentrate on protecting their members.The Labour party is there for the political side.I agree r.e. Farage. He isn't my guy but he is running rings round the politicians at the moment.
Len McClusky is already head puppeteer at Labour and the public know it. People got tired of the unions and most people that are in unions are in the public sector and paid for by the state. Why are people going to vote for McClusky when they wouldn't vote for his choice Milliband and most definitely not going to vote for his much preferred choice Corbyn?
Yes he is making the right sounds but then they have been quiet about this through the last 12 years and only recently Ed hinted at saying "yes it's true" and Corbyn hasn't added much to it. McClusky's other problem (as with Corbyn) is they want out of Europe but want the blame to go to the Tories so they don't offend their liberal voters. Good job because all they have left are those liberal voters.
.
Donald Trump has said that he will not take the same salary as Obama $400k x 8 years = $3.2million and he will do the job for $1 (one dollar) a year.
I think that the election of Trump and the popularity of Farage are precisely why Labour must move towards the Left and explains the popularity of Momentum. I don't belong to any political party but thought that the SWP had been destroyed by infighting and was no longer viable.
If everyone belonged to a Trade Union, them the political affiliations would be more diverse and there is a better chance that they would behave in a sensible manner. We forget that the economy is there is serve the people whereas most Govt these days works on the function that the people must serve the economy. Labour under Corbyn recognise this and they just need to keep posting this mantra and they will walk in to power when the wheels come off after Brexit.
The biggest disappointment for me is that Labour has not backed EU membership insofar that is sees it as a tool of globalisation and big enterprise. This is their big mistake as the EU does a lot for human rights. I think they should have been more enthusiastic for it in the referendum but maybe could have worked with other socialist parties in the member states to ensure that an agenda that favours people ahead of enterprise is promoted.
A message from my new mate Jeremy. Can't say I'm sure about him yet, but I can't argue with any of this, and he says it all better than I could;
Last week's US Presidential election result was a global wake-up call.
Whether in the US or the UK, people are feeling left behind – marginalised by an economic system that makes them work harder for less, while hoovering up ever greater rewards for a small elite.
People are right to be angry. Our political and economic system is delivering rising inequality and falling living standards.
Young people today find it harder to get a home of their own, harder to find good secure jobs, and are landed in lifelong debt simply for wanting an education.
Older people see their children and grandchildren struggling, their libraries and community services cut, their friends’ social care get worse.
They’ve seen politicians privatise what were once our collective assets, and they are paying the higher bills and higher fares as a result.
If we, as socialists, don’t step forward and offer solutions, then into the vacuum step the merchants of hate and blame.
They see the problem, but instead of offering solutions to make people’s lives better, they offer someone to blame.
The Tories do the same. They have opened the door to UKIP and fanned the flames of fear.
The Tories pretend to understand people’s problems, but offer nothing but someone to blame.
Meanwhile, the economy is slowing again. People’s pay still hasn’t recovered from the last recession and housing costs have soared. The Tories are cutting schools’ budgets, have slashed social care and have put the NHS into its worst crisis.
It’s time for our party – half a million strong, with more members than all the other UK parties combined – to get out there to tell people why a Labour government matters.
Our party doesn’t have the benevolence of the press barons, it doesn’t have the donations of billionaires, so please speak to your fellow party members, trade unionists and friends and ask them to take part in our National Campaign Day on Saturday 26 November.
Come on Archers. HE starts off well, then starts saying that people don't look for solutions just someone to blame and then blames the Tories for letting UKIP in!!!
At least we both agree he started well.Britain has no overall strategy for leaving the European Union and splits in Prime Minister Theresa May's cabinet could delay a clear negotiating position for six months, according to a memo for the government that was leaked to The Times newspaper.
The document, prepared by consultancy firm Deloitte for the government department that supports the prime minister and her cabinet, casts Britain's top team in a chaotic light: May is trying to control key Brexit questions herself while her senior ministers are divided and the civil service is in turmoil.
"The Prime Minister is rapidly acquiring the reputation of drawing in decisions and details to settle matters herself - which is unlikely to be sustainable," according to the document, dated Nov. 7 and published by The Times.
"It may be 6 months before there is a view on priorities/negotiation strategy as the political situation in the UK and the EU evolves," said the document, titled "Brexit Update".
May's spokeswoman said the Deloitte memo was unsolicited, had nothing to do with the government and had no credence. Deloitte declined immediate comment.
"It was not commissioned by the government," May's spokeswoman told reporters. "It does seem as though this is a firm touting for business now aided by the media."
But such a disorderly portrayal of the government underscores both the extent of the turmoil unleashed by the June 23 vote to leave the EU and the uncertainties ahead as May tries to pull Britain out of the world's biggest trading bloc.
Like the Brexit vote, Donald Trump's victory in the United States has underscored how swiftly assumptions are being turned upside down, pushing governments, investors and chief executives into the unknown.
The pound fell as much as 1.3 percent to 87.07 pence per euro EURGBP=D4 following the memo leak before recovering to 86.92 pence. It also lost more than half a percent to $1.2417. GBP=D4
'NO COMMON STRATEGY'
The memo said no common strategy had emerged, partly as a result of splits within the government and partly due to the evolving political situation in the rest of the EU where both France and Germany face major elections in 2017.
May's cabinet is split, with Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, Trade Minister Liam Fox and Brexit Minister David Davis - who all campaigned to leave the EU - on one side and finance minister Philip Hammond and Business Secretary Greg Clark - who wanted to remain - on the other, according to the memo.
May's priority, it said, is survival and keeping her ruling Conservative Party together, rather than business or economic considerations.
"Industry has 2 unpleasant realizations - first, that the Government's priority remains its political survival, not the economy," the memo said.
"Second, that there will be no clear economic-Brexit strategy any time soon because it is being developed on a case-by-case basis as specific decisions are forced on Government."
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-br..._medium=Social
Lol![]()






Who to believe....http://news.sky.com/story/brexit-plan-there-is-no-government-strategy-leaked-memo-reveals-10658080
Nothing to see here:
'The leaked memo, which claimed the Government had no plan for Brexit, was drawn up by an accountancy firm "touting for business", Number 10 has said.
A spokeswoman for Downing Street said the "unsolicited" document had "nothing to do with the Government" and had "no credence".
She added it was drawn up by someone who "has not been inside Number 10 or engaged with number 10 since the Prime Minister has been in Government".'
Who to believe....
I don't believe either fully.Well I know which one I believe.
http://news.sky.com/story/brexit-plan-there-is-no-government-strategy-leaked-memo-reveals-10658080
Nothing to see here:
'The leaked memo, which claimed the Government had no plan for Brexit, was drawn up by an accountancy firm "touting for business", Number 10 has said.
A spokeswoman for Downing Street said the "unsolicited" document had "nothing to do with the Government" and had "no credence".
She added it was drawn up by someone who "has not been inside Number 10 or engaged with number 10 since the Prime Minister has been in Government".'