The EU debate - Part III

Aye up, another thick **** hoping to deflect from the obvious fact some of you are defending the indefensible.

Had I posted it as response, you'd perhaps have a teeny point. As I posted as a topic in it's own right, your reply just highlights your desperation.

 

I pointed out that it was yet another dodgy link posted by you, as they all seem to be.
I then pointed out why the content was bullshit and asked you if you had anything else to back it up with.
You decided not to address either point, but to deflect and talk ****, as usual.

You do it constantly and in response to everything, while standing by every baseless claim.
Soros paid for riots, did he? Ok, back it up. Show us some evidence.
You won't, though. You'll do what you always do, which is deflection. It's embarrassing.

 

You seem to think that every response is a win for you, for some reason. It really isn't.
Your attempts to wind me up fail constantly and you just look like a child throwing a wobbly.

 

Boba Fett was vaguely cool, so no. He didn't do anything and died miserably, but he did it in style!
More Jar Jar, I think.

As for Jabba, I'm saying nothing.

 

More weak sauce bullshit really.
I couldn't give a **** at the end of that day. I am through trying to debate on this thread.
It basically has devolved into a bunch of right wingers, quoting, linking and discussing racist and bigoted ****, yet claiming through some bullshit caveat, that they are none of these things, they just permanently drown themselves in Right wing media for a laugh.
Then on the other, a bunch of left wing people who have just boiled down to hurling insults at the right wingers and offering little else of relevance (in some cases) because they have the moral high ground. (I include myself in this bracket too, whats good for the goose.....)

Its boring, its spanned over 2500 pages over 3 different threads now, the same half a dozen people talking ****......
No one has achieved anything.
The only silver lining of all this is that I have come to realise how much of a ****ing scumbag Kustard is, a guy who I previously thought was semi decent. (And yes I realise the irony of this sentence given the sentence in bold, but it's a fact.)

 

THAT'S REALLY UNKIND...YOU MEANIE

 

There are a couple of reasons that so many insults are being hurled, in my opinion.
Firstly, about half of the left wingers are invisible to the right, so they're posting stuff for the amusement of those that can see them.
Secondly, any and all attempts at reasoned argument are ignored and deflected.

The other thing is that people are taking offence at things that aren't insults or abuse.
If I point out that Breitbart is an exceptionally ****ty source, full of racists, bigots and bullshit, that's not a criticism of the person posting it.
I'm not calling them a racist or a bigot, merely pointing out that they might want to look elsewhere.
It's heavily ridiculed by those on the right, having taken Fox's template and run off a cliff with it.

 

Once again I've stuck to the simple point, but it takes an age to pick through your petty abuse, deflection and bullshit.

 

You don't half post a lot for someone that doesn't care.

 

This is more deflection and nonsense.
I asked you to provide evidence for your claim that Soros has paid for riots. You posted this, instead.

 

If you point at the source and miss the point, that's simply a deflection. It's not debate.

You're not alone in doing that.

 

As I said, it takes an age to pick through the bullshit, abuse and deflections in your replies to try to work out what your point could possibly be.

Clearly, your point is to defend a guy that amongst other things, describes himself as an uncaring megalomaniac.

 

I pointed at the source and then dealt with the point, which was that it's claims were unsupported.
You then claimed that you knew they were **** already, which makes no sense.

This is just more deflection, as you can't debate anything.

 

And more deflection.
Provide evidence for your claim that Soros has paid for riots.

 

Nope. You pointed out a comment was what you felt was anti-semetic. It was a pointless diversion.

 

I have no idea who you think you are, but you're not someone I take 'demands' seriously from. And that's not just because you support a nazi megalomaniac.

I'll have a think a maybe post some later.

Thus far, you're nicely confirming my point about the hypocrisy of some on here.

 

I didn't feel it was anti-Semitic, it was. There's no debate over it.
You posting **** links to crap sources is not a pointless diversion. It's a theme.
I deal with the subjects, while pointing out how poor and bigoted your sources are.

The Youtube channel was called Truthergirls, which should've been something of a heads up for you.
It's literally named after a stupid conspiracy theory.

Now, can you stop deflecting and answer the question? No. You can't.

And more deflection and projection. Well done.

Time to retreat to your safe space, I think.

 

What a load of bollocks.

You're proving my point about the hypocrisy with every deflective reply.

Look at the burden of proof you require for your self confessed nazi megalomaniac, and compare it to the KKK comments even after Trump says he found it repulsive.

 

The burden of proof? You haven't provided any evidence at all.
Repeatedly calling Soros a Nazi doesn't make you look like an anti-Semite at all, by the way.
Note, again, that I haven't defended Soros or said anything positive about him.

Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.

 

The fact you think falling him for what he is makes me anti semitic and your admission to saying nothing is just more proof of your hypocricy.