The EU debate - Part III

Really?...

Good!...

 

I was thinking the same More diversion with little substance. Typical Pete.

I did find this rather insightful though...

Some of Trump’s positions are actually in line with those of Clinton, such as protecting Social Security and increased skepticism toward trade.


Trump’s lack of detailed pledges and firm stances may be advantageous."Voters generally do not punish candidates for being vague, and in partisan elections voters actually prefer ambiguous candidates over precise ones," Stanford University political scientists Michael Tomz and Robert Van Houweling found in a study. "The reason, we find, is that ambiguity allows voters to 'see what they want to see’ in members of their own party."

 

Don't mention it.
http://www.janegoodwin.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/dumb-america.jpg

 

What unsupported personal comments have I made?

I've made plenty of arguments, but they all go straight over your head, apparently.
Anything that I ask you is ignored, as you'd rather deflect and avoid any discussion.

 

I don't get it.

 

Standard Dull tactics.

My advice would be, play when you have the time or are in the mood. If not, just ignore him, or he'll drone on until you lose the will to live!...

 

Where?

 

Indeed you don't.

 

It echoes something that I've seen said elsewhere. Trump's a Rorschach test for his supporters.
They see what they want to see in what he says, as it's often vague, rambling and internally contradictory.
My favourite example of it is when he turned himself around in one comment:
"There can be no discrimination against gays. I'm against gay marriage."

 

Probably because she thinks you're a ****.

 

It was private.

 

I think that may be the heart of the problem.

Neither he nor Dog's tiddler are getting it...

It breeds frustration and discontent. Especially when you're tiddler is owned by somebody else!....

 

Agreed.

 

Are you a sex pest Big Stan? Paco will love you.

 

I wouldn't take advice from stuttering, his record is appalling.

So you weren't trying to tar me as an alt right, anti-semitic, conspiracy theorist then. righty ho.

Your 'argument' thus far has been to attempt to dismiss the website that posted the claim that Soros is funding the groups behind the riots..

 

I'm actually quite optimistic about Trump tbh PNP, but not for the reasons many think, and certainly not for most of the 10 points (iirc) in that article of Pete's. My optimism is based on his insular approach to the USA, which I hope will mean he'll leave the rest of the world, the **** alone. It's funny though, that the one thing which might just benefit his own people domestically, is the one policy he shares with Clinton

 

Not tarring, no. Just stating facts...

 

You're looking for God's Tiddler. He's been posting this evening about going to Spain to shag a ladyboy called ti.

 

Cheers.

He doesn't seem to realise he made them. At least you see they're unsupported too.

Maybe he can move away from the silly ad hominems and diversions and finally get on with discussion now.