The EU debate - Part III

Cos it costs money that can be better spent on tax cuts?

 

So it isn't a fact then?

 

Treble said: "The real danger is not Donald Trump, it's Mike Pence. He is the right wing born again fundamentalist Christian. Believes that we are living in the end times. Wants to change the capital of Israel to Jerusalem so the prophecy can be fulfilled - the war Armageddon."
but he has not produced any evidence that Mike Pence thinks that.

 

50 years? You liberal bastard

 

Scientists overwhelmingly agree that man-made climate change isn't debatable at all.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm
The claims to the contrary are as false as those denying the consensus on evolution and it's often the same people.

You need to start paying attention to better sources.

 

Depends on what you require as proof. In the balance of probabilities, for me it's a fact. If you choose not to believe she's a self seeking, nasty piece of work, you probably prefer it not to be. I'm happy for the system to decide her fate now. I'm grateful she lost as she would have made the world a more dangerous place.

 

Gang of 115 arrested across Europe for 'smuggling 6,000 Ukrainians into Britain through Ireland using fake Polish passports'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...sing-fake-Polish-passports.html#ixzz4PivzumeX

 

I'm left wing enough to require a conviction before I assert that someone has committed crimes. I'm perfectly happy if people have opinions on her but they ought to be based on facts not innuendo.

 

It's a bit of a pointless diversion, but rather than have you squeal about not answering I'll reply, but remember whose diversion this is.

You'd be surprised what my sources are, and science isn't a democracy where decisions are based on weight of numbers. Scientists all still debate it to try to understand it better. You perhaps need a better understanding of what debatable and scientific mean.

 

JAN MOIR: Boys dressed as princesses and the trouble with gender neutral parenting
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...e-gender-neutral-parenting.html#ixzz4PiwrOzpz

 

I did base it on facts. It's the conclusions I reach that you can debate. It's not just assumptions. It's pointless anyway, I'm content to leave it to the authorities now she's out of the picture for president.

Losing could have done her a favour.

 

What the **** has this and the other crap posted got to do with the EU debate?
Admit you are just a troll..

 

What are your sources, then? Why on earth would you claim to have great sources, then not reveal them?
This is more of the same Trump bullshit.

"I've got the best sources, the best. Believe me.
People tell me that all the time. Hull, they say, you've simply got the best sources. They're great.
Nobody has better sources than me. Those other sources? They're the worst. Awful.
My sources tell me the Chinese are making it up. It's true. Believe me."

 

I don't particularly care if you believe me or not. Who are you anyway?

She's irrelevant now, so farting about trying to 'prove' it on here is totally pointless. She lost, I'm glad. After digging in to bits and bobs, I believe she was bad news, and the poster girl for the issues people are rejecting.

 

Exactly what I was saying. Utter bullshitter.

 

watch from 8.30 - the poor dears are so upset

 

If it makes you happy to believe that, fill your boots. It's not as though you're important.

 

Ah, the sign of a true dishonest coward.
If you've got reputable sources, then show them. What are you scared of?

 

What? You mean like Treble?
He accused Mike Pence of something and then when I asked for evidence he went quiet.