The EU debate - Part III

When did I say that you wouldn't complain if it was the other way round?

Is Trump a ****ing loon about climate change? Does that set him apart from Clinton?

 

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...ggaMAA&usg=AFQjCNHiWFaCE-XezW5PeFBFmBXcSRDgEw

Sensible ideas for a sensible Britain

 

After paying £300 for treatment in the US, RICHARD LITTLEJOHN asks: Why should British taxpayers cough up for foreign health tourists?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...gh-foreign-health-tourists.html#ixzz4PinVZohq

 

**** me, and I'm supposed to be the one diverting?

Okay, climate change, they're both sceptics and put money first. The difference is that Clinton has clearly shown that she'll act in a way detrimental to the environment with her arguments and actions on oil pipelines etc, Trump has clearly said he will make sure everyone has crystal clear water and clean air to breath. It's not directly linked to climate change, which he seems to dismiss, but is at least better than Clinton.

Okay, you didn't directly say that I wouldn't complain if it was the other way around, but it's a reasonable assumption that's what you meant from the linked comments and subsequent replies.

http://www.not606.com/threads/the-eu-debate-part-iii.335684/page-684#post-9905104

If you're agreeing with my replies, and accept I would approach both the same, then I apologise for the assumption.

 

Experts reveal how children as young as THREE struggle with gender identity - but warn pressure to 'fit in' could be behind increase in those wanting sex change
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...E-struggle-gender-identity.html#ixzz4PioXVtif

 

Struggle with gender? **** me. a lot of three year old's struggle between a cat and a cow.

 

thats 50 years for you with Stan as your cell mate

 

Only the loony left can do this.

out of interest what the **** if fluid gender

 

You see this below is precisely what I'm worried about...

 

So you're the one making assumptions then, by your own admission?

"When it comes to climate change, the science is crystal clear."
"That’s why as President, I will work both domestically and internationally to ensure that we build on recent progress and continue to slash greenhouse gas pollution over the coming years as the science clearly tells us we must."



He's going to abolish the EPA, remove laws that address climate change and he's put Myron Ebell in change of it.
He's not a scientist, he's a lobbiest, having previously worked for the tobacco industry.
He believes that climate change is a hoax too, but not created by the Chinese. He thinks that the EU did it.

This is not better than Clinton. This is utter lunacy.
The Monster Raving Loonies would employ someone more qualified, frankly.
This is Trump in action. More corporate interests and **** the peasants and the future.

 

Have you got a link of him saying that?

 

And that's who'd take over if Trump were to, say, get locked up or have to resign.
Can't think of any reason why that might happen though, eh?

 

Let's hope not. Ironic isnt it. Pray for Donald lol.

Personally don't think it matters either way. Donald president and Pence will be the conduit for ****s like Rumsfeld and Wolfiwitz to enter the White House. They're the real players.

 

Sorry America, we're not leaving! Celebrities who had promised to leave for Canada and beyond decide to stay (so is it just a coincidence that Trump is planning tax cuts?)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ce-Trump-planning-tax-cuts.html#ixzz4PisRTBSC

 

Yep, I made assumptions and was wrong. I'm glad you agree that I'm even handed in this though.

It's more man made climate change that's debatable, the climate will change, it's why there's oil under the desert and the Yorkshire Wolds exist etc. Any ideas he has, he has to get through the house., which will take years, and then even longer for any impact to be felt. If your fears come true, another election will be available before any impact and for people to overturn it. No need for panic.

Clinton abused her position for financial gain, and couldn't give a fig about the environment, but it's a pointless comparison, she lost and is now irrelevant to all but investigators.

 

What is loony or left wing about trying to help children with problems?

 

It's your desperation, pal. Trying to prove something that you simply can't. Because there quite simply was no criminal activity, as the FBI concluded after going through 100,000's of emails.

And there's only numpty here at this time, and everybody knows who that is!....

 

Why do you think this and if it is true why hasn't she been charged?

 

They scanned through a selection of the emails. The others are still being looked at for other issues. Just to stay on track, as I know it's important to you, you've still failed to highlight your quote in the FBI document we're talking about.

 

I think it's true having looked at a variety of bits of information. She hasn't been charged for similar reasons to others that do it. She's irrelevant now though, she lost and is history.