The EU debate - Part III

30 years sat in a garage as a book keeper for cabbies and local tradesmen must have given you a stunning level of varied life experience Pete.

We must surely all bow to your expansive knowledge of life.

 

Unfailingly polite? "In my experience what people claim as 'common sense' is often really stupidity."

 

Yes - it's often true. I didn't say or even imply that it referred to you.
Actually it is an idea first raised by Descartes which I will paraphrase as 'Common sense isn't sufficient, you need to do more detailed analysis (he called it sceptical reasoning).

 

do you think it doesnt apply to me, then?

 

The dozy old twat thinks it's ok for him to insult all and sundry, but not for them to do the same.

With a bit of luck, he'll put you on ignore soon!.....

 

It's too early to tell. I can't rule it out on the basis of your only use of it so far.

 

What's impolite about that? He was giving his view based on his personal experience

What's impolite is some gimp sat in his garage saying "I prefer my experience to yours any day", despite not having a clue what the person that was aimed at life experience is, merely assuming that yours trumps it (no pun intended), as you have constantly done throughout this entire debate, you think you're some sort of bigshot engaging with no marks. Looking down your nose at people who've probably vastly outstripped what you've done an achieved in life - as we've all seen your ****er.

Shame can't read this

 

that's being evasive

 

Then why are you so obviously, odiously, committed to flaunting your own stupidity? You wear ignorance and hate like a badge of honour. To re-iterate; stupidity could be your middle name.

 

I'll leave it up, but I ****ed up thinking PowerSpurs was the other numpty.

 

In which case, Power is wrong, as his claim was that she was cleared. (EDIT: whoops,I've just noticed power's not the other numpty)

The FBI didn't conclude that thre was no evidence of criminal behaviouys on the first investigation, in fact they found the opposite.

 

As you can quite clearly see, in their own words there is no evidence of criminal behavior.

So why keep belabouring the whole thing?

 

Pete has a similar problem as he is also owned on a regular basis by multiple posters

 

Talk about pointless

Trump is due in court to counter allegations of fraud at the end of the month btw.

 

Same way as people keep talking about a second referendum

 

Genius http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/uk_5825cb47e4b09ac74c52316b?

 

Pound up against Dollar and Euro



Yes its still crap I know

 

Who does?

 

Trump in 2012:

He also called for an uprising, claiming that Obama had lost the popular vote to Romney:
"He lost the popular vote by a lot and won the election. We should have a revolution in this country!"
He was wrong and Obama won by about 5m votes.

Also: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/u...t-university-of-mississippi-turns-unruly.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27738018/...ction-spurs-race-threats-crimes/#.WCXfM_mLSUk

Seriously, do you ever think before you post this stuff?
Trump called for this and he's got a slight taste of it. He can't really complain, can he?

 

Dull owned again. I almost feel sorry for him.