The EU debate - Part III

Apparently? Who told you that?

 

Bloody hell, be careful, No Testosterone Tobes is going to call you a racist for that!

 

You ****ing idiot. I grew up in Liverpool a multi cutural community. Many of my mates were black, they were either 2nd or 3rd generation 'immigrants'. They were British. British born scousers, the colour of their skin was irrelevant, they were as British as I was, and still are. Many have even bred, you scared, small minded bigot.

 

He came here with his family many years ago, they were economic migrants. He's now a British citizen.

It's not illogical once you look past your bigotry of low expectations, we don't all think the same, we are individuals.

 

The same people who told you that the Tories are behind May and the EU will bend over to her demands...?

 

Of answering the questions, as proven by this very reply.

 

Did I say that?

 

You made it a negative point in a list of other negative points and you've not actually given an answer.

 

I'm in that very same category as them, from an immigrant background. You're naive if you think our upbringing isn't heavily influenced by exterior cultures.

 

You'll have to explain your second paragraph duckie.

And also why your old man's family were acceptable as economic migrants but current and future economic migrants (who will one day be British citizens) have you reaching for Mein Kampf and a tissue.

 

Aren't you damaging the cultural heritage of the country by being here then, going by your standards?

 

No, stop being a ****. You're not going to put words into my mouth and you're not going to manipulate what I said to try and carry on your villainous representation of me. I didn't make it a negative point, I directly took it from the article, which I stated before I copied and pasted in. I have nothing against mixed race relationships. It's rich for you to accuse me of dodging a question when you did the very same thing with my post from which you're now trying to discredit me with.

 

I'm being a **** by quoting you? There goes that one, again.
As for "villainous representation", I think I'll leave that for others to ridicule!

You pointed out a series of things that you believe are contributing to a white genocide, which you think is a bad thing.
If you don't think that these are bad individually, then you should have said so, as it's a natural assumption.
If you didn't want people to believe that, then you should've made it clear.
I asked you for clarification for that reason. I didn't accuse you of anything.

What points did I dodge from your comment?

 

You said this "I'm trying to understand your, seemingly illogical, anti immigrant mindset given you are the son of an immigrant". Why should I be pro immigration because I'm the son of an immigrant? Should people who have had cancer be pro cancer? You've unintentionally exposed yourself as a collectivist.

Again, you've asked me about this...

"So your old man was an acceptable immigrant for what reason(s)?"

My response:- "He wasn't"

 

That first paragraph is stunning in its stupidity. You've just compared immigrants with cancer.

 

I broke the mould and none of you like it. It's why you all say 'Diversity is our strength', 'diversity' (mass immigration) gives you political power because they overwhelmingly vote for left wing parties, not this one.

 

So I'm naive for thinking that one of my mates who I grew up with, a scouser who happened to be black, who's now a barrister, isn't currently heavily influenced by the exterior culture of the West Indies?

He likes jerk chicken and we used to enjoy a good toke, that aside does cricket count?

****ing dickhead

 

That answer doesn't address my question in any way. Could you try again, please?

 

Cancer and immigration...seriously?

 

No, you're being a **** for taking what I said completely out of context on purpose.

I didn't point them out, I took them directly from the Wikipedia page you posted, I haven't once spoken about white genocide, it was you that brought it up.