She also treated a lot of people quite badly. You know, in some areas there are probably 3rd generation unemployed now (not just Maggie's fault but she created the problem). And you may have been given a subsidised home to own but now councils don't have sufficient housing stock which helps to push up rents for non-home owners, so while to you it may seem good, RTB has had its downsides.
look you can come out with as much spiel as you want, you know and I know this is an attempt to derail brexit if its part of constitutional law how come parliament didn't vote on it as a matter of course and that some one had to take it to high court and how come parliament didn't vote on us entering when the people voted to stay in the common market, the people didn't get the vote regarding the common market till 1975, 2 years after we had joined so if your going to start quoting spiel ask your self did we actually LEGALLY join under our constitutional law the conservatives gave us the vote on leaving the eu as one of there general election mandates this clearly helped them to an overall majority not for one minute did they think we would vote to come out the point I actually made was if you have money in this country you can just about oh I don't know maybe raid pensions overturn a vote that you didn't like ect ect
It really helps to know a bit about what you're talking about. If your point is that money is useful, then of course you're right. If your point is that the people who brought the claim want to derail brexit, you are probably right If your point is that the judgement is wrong, I don't think you know anything about the subject. If your point is that there is a contradiction between the process used to join the EU and the judgement, then you certainly don't know what you are talking about. Rant if you like but if you want to say anything that isn't just class warfare babble, you will have to do some reading and some thinking.. Or you can just rant.
