The Brexit voters,knew full well what they voted for,they also know many remainers were bullied into a remain vote,polls say we would still vote out.Bring on march.
So all Brexit voters knew exactly what they were voting for? They all had a reason but not the same one, and how many on either side of the debate could truly understand all the likely ramifications? Which was my point. So, you may feel able to speak for all of them, but i can't agree. We don't know what leaving the eu will look like now! Whichever as a fellow Leeds fan I'm glad you're optimistically looking forward to March, I hope it brings better luck than we normally have in March! Personally I expect a relegation dogfight for the country but really hope i'm wrong. As for regrets. We'll see how regretful people feel in a year or two when they see the cost of living heading north. Ultimately any deal we do going forward with the eu is dependent on how concerned they are at the trade loss v how worried they are at setting a precedent, which isn't easy to predict.
Its the remainiacs who are telling the Brexiteers that they didn't know what they were voting for When the idiots who voted Cameron in did they say "oh, hang on a minute, I didn't want George Osbourne as chancellor, can we vote again. This is an attack on democracy, and if they get their way, the polltax riots will be a picnic compared to what will happen,
I can assure you I've never voted for Cameron, and I don't think there should be a second referendum. There should never have been a first one, for reasons I've stated. No-one on either side knew then or still knows what Brexit will look like in the long run. It's a leap in the Unknown. The only entirely predictable element was a plunging pound and a period of economic uncertainty. I have no problem with the vast majority of people who voted for it. I think they voted for a pay cut, and I dont agree with them, but that's life. The vote happened, leave won, so we should leave with the best deal we can get and move in.
Good post, Milkyboy. I can only agree with you. The pollies were ALL elected to represent the wishes of the people regardless of their personal beliefs, and should do so. As you say, 'get the best deal' you can.
Who wants a second referendum ????? Why would anyone want that to listen to more lies from both sides......What we want is the Brexit in its current form to be debated in parliament like it should be and now it will be thanks to the courts that took just 30 minutes to decide, a record in these sort of cases...The public, businesses and everyone else involved need to know what does Brexit mean for everyone......Is it Hard Brexit or Soft Brexit or in between Brexit.....We all have a right to know as it's our lives Theresa is playing with here and she has no right to make this very important decision on her own....Thank god she has been stopped in her tracks and cant now sign Article 50 until there is a proper debate in parliament and the house of lords the proper way that may give her approval or may not and Brexit becomes a farce and ditched as too much to lose... ....
It seems that it was the remainiacs who didn't know what they were voting for, you idiots should have asked the question before you voted, not crying like bitches because you lost.
Isnt that debates do. Eventually the loonies wi realise that the remainers were right and pipe down...
Correct. Will be the very same as the TTGM loonies. They now realise they were wrong and have packed it in
For the delusional remainiacs (you know who you are), May is now in the perfect no lose situation because if she loses the supreme court appeal, which I doubt as Government's usually get their way. If she loses the appeal she will then feel she has no choice but to go to the country for the mandate she so requires, she'll put article 50 into the manifesto and given that the Tories are 18 points clear of Labour, she'll be returned with a 3 figure majority and wipe Labour out forever in the process. Tory MP's won't then dare vote against a hard Brexit once May has the mandate from the people and so it'll then be voted through and legislated by Parliament - nuff said. That being the case we can expect an early election, to dissolve parliament and get the legislation through parliament in time to trigger article 50 by the end of March/early April, as was originally planned.
Cooo! That's a pretty intelligent post for a mere train guard. You should put in for a driver's job, Stevo. It just so happens i know a rail system that is crying out for drivers.
She can certainly do most of that but she can't dissolve parliament early and call an election for March. Cameron and Clegg introduced the fixed term parliament act as part of the coalition government so each government serves five years. She would need to debate and rescind that first.
I did ask Elland,for a not 606 referendum on Brexit.where people can add a comment if they have changed their mind on their vote.of coarse people would have to refrain from excessive abuse and Swearing or they might get it pulled like the last vote.
