The EU debate - Part III

I didn't doubt you'd try to use that as justification, which is why I'd already mentioned it, but finding things out about people by using google and other tools and a few clues on here is often not difficult, but it doesn't make it acceptable to then post it on here.

The fact nobody knows anything about your wife makes your justification and indignance even weaker. Peter just brushes it off as fools being fools trying to divert discussions.

It doesn't need google to see your hypocrisy on this.

 

No I wouldn't, though unfortunately we are on the internet and unless he reveals some detail about himself, there isn't much chance of ****ting down his throat.
I see your point though.

 

You're argument is non existent!

Absolute whitewash bollocks. Nobody knows much about my lady, as I choose not to post any really personal details. Just like 99.9999% of all the other posters here.

Personal insults, I can handle. Insult my family and that's way out of order.

If you can't see and accept that, then you're a ****ing hypocrite.

Oh wait, of course you are!...

 

I'm agreeing with you about the abuse of your wife.

If you can't see the difference, you're a hypocrite.

 

Once again, I have never resorted to highly personal insults about another poster's wife or family.

Only one poster I know of has!....

 

And as I said, where you draw your line is your prerogative, as is my decision to see your position as clear hypocrisy.

Neither of us will convince the other any different, so it's a pointless discussion.

 

In fairness the ****wits who wrote neighbours deserve a slow lingering death

 

I see your position as clear hypocrisy.

There is only one poster I'm aware of who has resorted to highly personal insults about another poster's family.

 

Sometimes, people only see what they want to see.

As I said, it's a pointless discussion, I agree with you, which puts paid to your hypocrisy claim, but your double standards are self evident, despite your claim of justification based on where you draw your line.

 

You're right.

Some people only see what they want to see, instead of what's actually happening or has happened.

So, unless you can point me to an instance of where a highly personal insult has been used against another poster's family, and I've supported it. Your argument is empty.

 

If I'd claimed that, you'd maybe have a point. I did say some had dragged his family and friends into it.

As it is, it's just you trying to find ways to justify your hypocrisy.

 

Can we just agree Gods tagnut is a bitter, racist **** and move on?

Finally a backlash towards the right wing rags

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37882082

They need reigning in, their bile filled hate is poisoning this country, they're feeding the bigots and racists daily these days, slowly making their fascist agenda mainstream

 

Yeah, fair enough.

 

You still going to the game later Tobes?

 

The left wing bias of other mainstream media outlets is equally deplorable, particularly the BBC due to its perceived status.

 

No mate, I gave my tickets away as I didn't fancy the late train back or a night in the smoke.

 

The opposite end of that spectrum has not printed anything even remotely close to the slanted bollocks we've seen from the Tory rags of late.

Their latest attack on the judiciary is contemptible

 

Long journey back with no points.

 

Fair enough, should be a good game. Hope you lose though.

 

I think we will, but we should give you a decent game.

Making it a 5.30 given our travelling support is a joke tbh