I think you mean...
Believable.
You thinking I owe you an apology certainly is
You need to grow a pair, lad.
There isn't any concrete evidence to say you are or aren't....don't tell me about the IP address Hull gave as evidence, I am well versed in IT networking to know that's not proof as explained earlier by me.Why aren't you screaming "****!" at Pixie & Bambi for their rabid insistence that Saints and I are the same person, hypocrite?
No, you need to admit you were wrong. But you won't, because you simply do not have it in you.
There isn't any concrete evidence to say you are or aren't....don't tell me about the IP address Hull gave as evidence, I am well versed in IT networking to know that's not proof as explained earlier by me.
For those who suspect let them do so and for those that don't then let them do so also, unless there is concrete over whelming evidence either way! But it seems you only take in the information you choose to read and take and carry on with the same whining like a 5 year old about the same thing.
That's the level I expected from an uncouth Spud....
Not interested leave me alone.....go see HIAG or something, he likes bums (especially yours)![]()
Thing is he is trying to use the IP addressing as the evidence, which I know fairly well, for anyone to trace and be 100% certain whether 2 accounts are used by same person is very hard to prove either way, unless you are getting help from the ISP to give you the information to the level where its traceable.If anybody accused you or me of having another account and it wasn't true you did probably just laugh at it, then brush it off.
Personally I think HIAG doth protest waaay too much ..... just saying.
1yr in Chicago and 3yrs in NYC .
1yr in Chicago and 3yrs in NYC .
What was the charge?
Worked on the CBT in Chicago - Chicago board of trade. And for EF Hutton and Merrill Lynch in NYC.

Anyone who backs up HIAG on anything must surely be HIAG, is that not proof enough. No one else is foolish enough to back him.![]()