The EU debate - Part III

Bit optimistic there, pieguts!

 

Mystical Stanley predicts that the response will be a variation of "that's not what was being discussed".

 

Yep, I've said so many times on this thread.

Did the method of reporting and gathering the data change last year?

What percentage of the claims are substantiated?

What percentage of the hate crime reported is racial, rather than against other minority groups, such as the disabled?

Did the problems exist pre-brexit?

Did brexit create a racist mindset that didn't exist before?

Does focusing on brexit help resolve the underlying problem?

If the argument is that it empowered previously quieter racists to voice their views, doesn't that imply that methods currently in place haven't worked?

 

How productive.

 

Hush now ladies, your bigoted predictions are as inaccurate as ever.

 

Usual bollocks...

 

Still no solution > still full of ****!...

But, please carry on trying to duck and dive. No one has noticed, honest...

 

I'm glad you're back to summarising the content of your quotes.

The clear fact we both agree on the key points of the issue so far, and you still just post childish abuse simply shows your limitations.

 

Brexiteers didn't want to build a sandcastle, they wanted to kick one down – and they've kept kicking at the ruins

"It should hardly come as a surprise that a certain type of Brexwit called for so long for Carney’s resignation. When the Governor of the Bank of England warned, in May, that Brexit would lead to a sharp drop in sterling, Jacob Rees-Mogg clamoured for his immediate resignation, a clamouring that has only got louder since sterling dropped by 10 per cent in 10 minutes in the early hours of June 24, and a further eight per cent since."

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...ank-canada-sandcastle-kick-down-a7389401.html

 

Is that all you've got!?

Pathetic...,

 

From someone that's held back the discussion on something they feel is important, that's as funny as ****, especially as we agree on the key points so far.

 

Mystical Stanley maintains his 100% success rate.

 

Why are you afraid to talk about the race problem that you raised, and we both agree on so far?

 

.

So, let's change the subject again, eh?!...

Sooooo predictable!...

 

To get back on track after some tried to divert things again.

The fact some see my reply to that question as evasive, sums up the limitations of some on here.

Some thick twats post abuse, and then claim it's ME diverting if I respond.

We seem to be all in agreement, but some seem intent on pushing their own agenda.

 

Not evasive at all Hull, but unless you have personally interviewed everyone who has been reported or charged with a hate type crime, then your claims cannot be considered as fact.

 

When a dozen doctors tell you to sit down, you should probably sit down.

Nietzsche

 

I worry that the thick, deluded twat actually believes this fine piece of total bollocks!

 

Hull

Do you agree that the leave campaign winning the vote on 23 June 2016 with one of it's main arguments being being the end of freedom of movement for citizens of the EU was interpreted by some as permission to abuse all immigrants.
Yes or no